Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question about whether Obama's plan to 'internationalize' the internet is constututional
americanthinker.com ^ | 9/29/2015 | Rick Moran

Posted on 09/29/2015 7:46:35 AM PDT by rktman

A group of Republican lawmakers have sent a letter to the General Accountability Office questioning the authority of the president to "transfer possession and control of critical components of the Internet's infrastructure to a third party."

The Obama administration plans to abandon oversight of internet doman name functions and allow an international body to assume control.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: dumbasses; internet; marxistpuke
LOLOLOLOL! Srsly? I'm sure the lyin' king will amend his ways once he learns that he may, just may, be violating the Constitution. Also rather comical "...group of republican lawmakers...."
1 posted on 09/29/2015 7:46:35 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

Why do we keep allowing “our stuff” to be given away?


2 posted on 09/29/2015 7:48:57 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Don ha know? Obama and the Constitution are like ships passing in the night


3 posted on 09/29/2015 7:49:51 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Congress will have blood on their hands if anything happens because of the Iran appeasement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

He’ll say the Internet isn’t in the Constitution.


4 posted on 09/29/2015 7:50:05 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Donncha know? Obama and the Constitution are like ships passing in the night


5 posted on 09/29/2015 7:50:24 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Congress will have blood on their hands if anything happens because of the Iran appeasement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Because we keep (s)electing hard core conservatives to represent us in d.c. (dysfunctional city). Geez, I woulda thought you’d a caught that. :>}


6 posted on 09/29/2015 7:50:51 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Who is going to stop this fire sale of American greatness?? These people will do as much destruction as the Republicans in Congress will allow! Is there ANYONE who will step forward and save our once great country??


7 posted on 09/29/2015 7:52:31 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

And here I thought it was because we didn’t deserve to be prosperous or maybe the muslims want all their innovations/inventions back that we stole.


8 posted on 09/29/2015 7:54:26 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
Why do we keep allowing “our stuff” to be given away?

Could it be that if we give ENOUGH $hit away maybe somebody will like us?

9 posted on 09/29/2015 7:58:09 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

To “internationalize” the Internet is Obama taking over the Internet.


10 posted on 09/29/2015 8:03:36 AM PDT by Slyfox (Will no one rid us of this meddlesome president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Since when did the U. S. Constitution ever mean any thing to Obama?? I blame congress for turning a blind eye each and every time Obama went again the U. S. Constitution. Since congress has done nothing in the past, I have no reason to believe that they will do anything this time.


11 posted on 09/29/2015 8:04:11 AM PDT by kagnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kagnew

That’s eggs-act-lee why we voted in hard core conservatives to protect us and our rights in the last (s)election. /s


12 posted on 09/29/2015 8:07:12 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rktman

the constitution.....how quaint


13 posted on 09/29/2015 8:07:17 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

I know. A throw back to ancient times. Really has no place in today’s society since it was written by a bunch of old white dudes that owned slaves. I’m so ashamed. (not!)


14 posted on 09/29/2015 8:11:00 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

Notice that some who had opposed giving it away now quietly support it. Reason, Donald Trump. These rogue lawmakers can’t keep winning if we can expose them and call them out on conservative news sites and Twitter.

There is no reason, and I mean NO REASON that even if they ever thought this was a good idea they can’t wait until Obama’s out of office to try this.

Oh wait, there’s actually two reasons (1) they can blame Obama and (2) they can pass the treasonous bill with no serious blowback because Obama still has media in his pocket.

If we ever fought anything with heart and soul it needs to be this. No IP, no Internet, no domain name, not conservative sites.


15 posted on 09/29/2015 8:16:21 AM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Jimmy had his Panama Canal... Barky needs to top that.


16 posted on 09/29/2015 8:22:34 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Unless and until somebody stands up and says NO and backs it up with penalties will the half breed be stopped. In addition to all the illegal moves he has made WITHOUT CONGRESS, he is currently engaged in destroying the Clintons and all Republicans.

All actions point to one man rule. He is probably one or two steps away from not needing Congress for anything but window dressing. What then? Can he be stopped? What if he cancels the 2016 elections? What then?


17 posted on 09/29/2015 8:31:02 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Obama knows he is constitutionally prevented from regulating content on the internet, but an international body would have no such restrictions.


18 posted on 09/29/2015 8:48:27 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson