Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

I agree with this. NEw Hampshire, actually, the primaries AFTER NH or the important ones.

IOwa is meaningless. REagan lost NH, then came roaring back in SC and beyond.

I think Carson will win Iowa, but that’s it.


2 posted on 09/24/2015 6:46:46 AM PDT by nikos1121 ("There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nikos1121

This author hit SEVERAL nails right on the head! Iowa is a hypocrite of a state(Ethanol). It is a LIBERAL state painted with “conservative” paint. Scratch the veneer off and Iowa is just a festering and liberal and screwed up as liberal Minnesota and liberal Missouri.


5 posted on 09/24/2015 6:53:23 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (I could Be a "Chump" for Trump, but right now I am still on "Cruz-Control"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: nikos1121

1988 is a poster year for the relevance of Iowa. Dukakis carried the state by more than 10 points while losing 40 other states and 426 electoral votes. You can look it up.


6 posted on 09/24/2015 6:57:24 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson