To: E. Pluribus Unum
Beware of bureaucrats with not enough to do.
Short version: Beware of bureaucrats.
2 posted on
09/20/2015 9:40:45 AM PDT by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It just does not get any worse. Fight back people.
3 posted on
09/20/2015 9:41:43 AM PDT by
dforest
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Arrogant B**ch, elitist trash.
“Thoughtful” = Leftist to this university zero.
4 posted on
09/20/2015 9:42:41 AM PDT by
Regulator
To: E. Pluribus Unum
" . . . is another example of opposition within the Commission to democratizing technological innovations."Another example? I can't remember the first.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Well, wait, thoughtful? Wouldn’t that be the Feds doing the thinking?
If only some successful businessman would come along and lead us out of Marxism
7 posted on
09/20/2015 9:45:18 AM PDT by
stanne
To: E. Pluribus Unum
8 posted on
09/20/2015 9:50:56 AM PDT by
Califreak
(Hope and Che'nge is killing U.S. Feel the Trump-mentum!(insert ireally.supportCruzdisclaimerhere/))
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Just another government parasite trying like hell to make her job relevant.
9 posted on
09/20/2015 9:57:46 AM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
the same thoughtful contributions/decesions the federal government has made??
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The title alone has got me puckering up.
11 posted on
09/20/2015 10:14:17 AM PDT by
Fhios
(Racial balkanization is just the .....)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“”Yes, I believe the American people are intelligent enough to make decisions,” said Democratic FEC chairwoman Ann Ravel. “But...”
Im from the government. Im here to help you.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The left calls it “dysfunction” when people don’t want to do something, anything, in place of doing nothing, because the “something” is always “progress”. That’s why we’re called “conservatives”, bcause we don’t always, or even usually, believe that “something needs to be sone”. More often, nothing needs to be done, people just need to be let alone.
13 posted on
09/20/2015 10:28:53 AM PDT by
mrsmel
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
In a post-State of the Union speech in Buffalo, NY on January 20, 1999, Bill Clinton was asked why not a tax cut if we have a surplus. Clinton's response:
"We could give it all back to you and hope you spend it right... But ... if you don't spend it right, here's what's going to happen. ... 'Do you really want to run the risk of squandering this surplus?' "
Source: Washington Times, January 21, 1999
14 posted on
09/20/2015 10:29:17 AM PDT by
ForYourChildren
(Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The gummint is going to tell people who to donate to?
15 posted on
09/20/2015 10:32:04 AM PDT by
arthurus
(It's true.The MSM)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Possibly misspoken. Probably more at:
FEC Chair: Feds Must Help Americans Make ‘Thoughtful-controlled’ Contributions
16 posted on
09/20/2015 10:43:54 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: E. Pluribus Unum
What a bunch of BS. Keep your nose out of people’s business. You, in government, have a tough time with handling your own business properly.
18 posted on
09/20/2015 11:25:58 AM PDT by
mulligan
(I)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson