[Charles Henrickson]

Well, he bailed on the Heritage Foundation ... because he would actually have been expected to present coherent positions...

I had the same thought. He's not too strong on substance and specifics.

[HandyDandy]

Well, he bailed on the Heritage Foundation ... because he would actually have been expected to present coherent positions...

I had the same thought. He's not too strong on substance and specifics.

The coherent positions, the substance and specifics will come along in time. You're confusing him with a "politician". Politicians have all of that in abundance. What good have coherent positions, substance and specifics done for us since the eighties? He has something no politician has had in years. His own coherent, specific and substantial money. He can't be bought.

[Tucker39]

Hey sour grapes. How do you like his position on the Second Amendment? Enough substance and detail for ya?

[piytar]

Yup, no specifics here. /SARC

[ripnbang]

I had the same thought. He’s not too strong on substance and specifics.

---

candidates who have 20 point plans and specific details at this point of the process will never follow through on them....remember repealing Obamacare? Or, situations will change in the next 18 mos that changes the variables. (9/11 changed everything and it was only 9 mos into W’s term). Have broad plans and big ideas, but hard to be specific at this point, unless pandering.