Waco: Biker’s Examining Trial On Probable Cause Set For Friday

KWYX ^ | September 17, 2015

[ExyZ]

“Bergman said after the hearing that four of the charges for which he was previously arrested were dismissed. The fifth involves the Twin Peaks case.”

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/judge-rules-probable-cause-sufficient-to-arrest-balch-springs-biker/article_0fedd53c-4b1d-51a2-b923-83efc1ae02c3.html

[mac_truck]

Where did they meet up to “ride together”?

Anywhere in the vicinity of Twin Peaks they wanted to... or were told to go.

No more stoopid questions ok?

[ExyZ]

Here’s a link to Broden’s brief.

It’s pretty clear after reading it why Jarrett/Schwartz took the cheap shot -

http://www.wacobikerjustice.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/examining-trial.pdf

[ExyZ]

But you don’t know when and where - - if at all, and it could be they arrived at the same time, independently?

So quit spreading falsehoods as facts, or someone might think you are a McLennan County prosecutor or Waco cop.

[Cboldt]

-- Here's a link to Broden's brief. --

Thanks. I linked to it earlier, @19, copied substantial parts of it to that post, and made a few remarks.

[TexasGator]

“How does that not go directly to probable cause? If they were arrested due to a faulty affidavit lacking factual elements, then how can it be a legal arrest in compliance with the 4th Amendment?”

Fact: Member of Motorcycle ‘club’ engaged in criminal activity.

[mac_truck]

Bergman was part of a crew of fifteen bikers you idiot, not some random independent. They rode in together in staggered formation and in rank order.

You came here from Aging Rebel didn’t you?

No wonder you’re fos.