Posted on 09/16/2015 12:45:39 PM PDT by Biggirl
(Ron) Paul has little room to criticize politicians for changing their party affiliations. He campaigned for president as a Libertarian in 1988, after running for office seven times as a Republican and serving as a GOP member of the U.S. House for more than six years at that point.
So why didnt he vie for the Republican nomination? Because hed renounced the party along with Reagans presidential policies a few years earlier, resigning from the GOP and forgoing a bid for reelection to Congress.
Paul is incredibly clueless. He should tell people why they should vote for him, not make predictions about others.
Rand and McWeasal have become very good pals and he supported McWeasal for re-election and McWeasal’s hit on McDaniel in Mississippi.
Related Articles to Tonights Debate (AKA Gang up on Trump)GOPe CNN Debate Tactic Revealed On FR: Carson's FaceBook Page: 400 Likes A Minute?'It's intellectual combat': At least 2 candidates are planning to rip into Donald Trump
Jeb Bush huddles in secret for off record meeting with Fox News, CNN, other Media ahead of debate
Rand Paul Preparing To Go After Trump In The Debate: I Think He Deserves Both Barrels
Its Time to Declare War on Donald Trump: An open letter to the candidates about tonights debate Ultimately the media will sell the GOPe the rope that hangs its pet candidates
Soros-backed, Bush-led immigration group plans attack ad for CNN debate
Rand Paul: Will Be Even Harder on Trump in Second Debate!
>> Trump is favored to even beat Cruz in TX.
I doubt Trump beats Cruz in Texas. We’ll see.
However, Trump will definitely carry Texas in a landslide should he win the primary.
I am not yet convinced that Trump is the best candidate for POUTS. BUT, the flak is REALLY think and now Dems and GOP-E seem to be crawling into bed together to tackle Trump.
And that make me happy. We should be pretty close to the target.
The only Kentucky poll I can find is from May when Paul was ahead. Has anybody seen a more recent one?
How out of step can this nutjob Rand Paul be:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3337593/posts
Folks don't want a wonk this time around. They want a double-barreled cannon. Paul, by comparison, is a kid's cap gun.
What do you call a GOP candidate who gets 25 percent of the black vote in the general election?
.
.
"President Elect." You call him "President Elect."
Paul would create a bigger loss.
who is rand paul........lolol oh wait i know a crybaby loser............build that bridge rand and get over it
Good diagnosis Doc. I’d say the indications are getting rid of their political advisers. Hard to get rid of your demanding donors however. Trump’s got ‘em on that one. Don’t really know how you get around that one. Wonder if Reagan used some of his own money. I know he stayed on message against the GOPe.
Any but Bush!!!
JMHO
After McCain and Romney, well hell, I am sticking with Trump. I will say it one more time. He can do a strip tease tonight at the debate and I will still vote for him.
Well said.
And if Trump had Cruz as his VP, there is no question that he would take Texas.
What about the record of all those other clowns running come out. Like Carly and her love for Cap & Trade?
Wow, what about that? What about Rand kissing McConnell’s ass for favors What about Bridgegate? What about Rubio sucking up to Chuck Schumer and lying about Comprehensive Immigration reform?
Just what about all that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.