Posted on 09/12/2015 1:14:45 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
You have a real problem.
When someone doesn’t agree with you, you resort to twisting what has been discussed in order to distort the truth and accuse others of something that they’ve never done.
You and Trump, 2 peas in a pod.
No, madam. I posited a question to you asking if you’d given up your Trump bashing and recognized no one will be as tough on illegals as he. I take it you don’t care about the illegal problem and truly solving it. If Governor Walker were as strident and unapologetic on addressing this mass-scale INVASION as Trump, he would not be in 10th place in the Iowa polls.
BTW, as you’ve been told repeatedly, I’m voting for Cruz in the primary. I don’t tout his candidacy by attacking the frontrunner — especially when I 100% agree with the frontrunner on this issue.
Trumps gonna start by deporting the gang members. I say that’s a damn good start. From there people who think they can stay here illegally forever may have second thoughts and may want to look into the legal way of immigration. the go home and apply for re-entry way. It’s sure worth a try. It won’t be easy at all to fix this mess they’ve left us with but in fact, I think it may be the only workable plan.
Not going to get far convincing George Will’s Wife of her hypocrisy.
They will have pressure to stop Trying and succeeding to change our culture, coming ahead of american citizens and veterans, combat vets in jobs, scholarships, admittance a, if trump is serious
And they are not happy they’ve got trump piñata s. Weird and trivial, but a reaction
Trump is all bluster. Illegal immigration and border security was a big issue before he tossed his rhetorical hand grenade into the picture.
Trump will happily tell you what a fabulous, amazing, terrific president Hillary will be when he attends her inauguration.
For those who want facts:
Walker revoked instate tuition for illegals (June 2011) 6 months into his first term. No other state or governor (18 still have it) have done what Walker did.
http://hispanicnewsnetwork.blogspot.com/2011/06/walker-revokes-in-state-tuition-for.html
Walker has been very vocal on illegals: “If somebody wants to be a citizen, they need to go back to their country of origin, get in line, no preferential treatment. In terms of what to do beyond that, again, that’s something we got to work with Congress on.”
Walker was confronted (staged by the media) an illegal immigrant flanked by his children; Walker was very clear about their illegal status and need to follow laws (which Obama did not).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7_HaEOIJhM
Walker has said revoking Obama’s EO on immigration will happen the 1st day that he is in office (Wisconsin is also part of the states’ lawsuit against that EO).
Walker was the first candidate to call for lowering the numbers of legal immigrants.
More:
That is what his position paper says.
And that is where it starts and stops on deporting illegals.
Please explain to me and the thread what my hypocrisy is.
> No welfare = no illegals
Seeral great benefits: (1) much lowered stress on deficit, (2) less taxes and stress on the American citizens who pay them, (3) Americans that need welfare benefits might actually be able to get them for a change, (4) overcrowding / overpopulation will diminish greatly, (5) less crime and auto accidents, particularly when it comes to identity theft of American citizens and the.chaos it causes; its become a very serious problem, (6) less government workers (police officers, teachers, CPS caseworker, etc) sneeded to deal with all the social problems, and best oa all, there will be jobs for Americans again!
I absolutely love his position paper on immigration. Do you have a problem with it?
Why is it that everyone implies that Trump is going to do as the good sheriff implies? It is not and will not be necessary if the laws already on the books are enforced and enforced on everyone, especially the cheap labor lobby of the CoC.
I say the immediate thing to bring into effect is not THREATEN compliance and enforcement of e-verify, but to enforce it very publicly. Nobody has any intention of just busting into anyone’s house unless probable cause and a court order, under the laws, is presented. And then just a simple knock on the door will suffice.
If they come into contact will law enforcement, even for a broken tail light, arrest if they are illegally here, process at ICE and on the bus they go.
The remaining will self deport much faster than the two year estimate given by Trump. His coming back legally means get into the back of the line. That is the way it is done legally, no line jumping, no get out of jail free cards, no go directly to “GO”. Those interested on playing by the rules will do just that. Those here for nefarious goals will not leave willingly and they are the ones who will be forced out or try to duke it out in a final blaze of glory.
I think everyone should read Trump’s position paper and compare it to what he says, has said, will say to the media.
Wow.
I got all the warm and fuzzies, now.
Howsabout JUST BEING HERE is something called “illegal”??
Self-deport kinda works for me, too.
Wrong in so many ways,!
You turn them over to DHS/ICE for them to be air- transported to middle Mexico,.. where their return is a physical and financial hardship ..
or return to their families, where they belong.
Does he have to be perfect for you? Is anyone perfect that’s running? I’m really NOT sold on Trump but I LOVE that he’s shaking things up. I’m so sick of the GOPe I’m willing to listen to new ideas at this point. He may just be very good for the future of America and Americans. That’s what he’s promising and he might just be the man to deliver. We need an antidote to Obama bad.
So you go to “perfection” as a defense.
There is no perfection.
But of course if it’s someone other than Trump, they must embody perfection.
“What he’s promising.”...
Good luck with that.
He isn’t an antidote to Barack.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/09/donald_trump_is_barack_obamas_third_term.html
...”If six years of an immature, pampered narcissist have not been enough for you – if you enjoy rule by a clique of incompetent über-wealthy cronies, with little regard for the constitution, led by a man with distorted knowledge of history, geopolitics, economics, basic science, world religions and conflicts, yet thinks he knows everything; who easily lies about his faith, and anything else, at any time or any place; who believes that language is as flexible as Humpty Dumpty’s words or merely Orwellian expedients; who has no fixed values and cannot be relied upon to keep his word; who was created by a craven, money-driven, valueless media; who has had the skids of life greased for him; who enjoys luxury to excess; who credits himself with every success, real or imagined; who never acknowledges a failure, even when his own words refute his lie; who never constructs a reasoned argument in debate; who never treats with respect those with a different opinion; who is intolerant of dissent and is highly insulted by even the mildest criticism; who appeals to our basest instincts and grossly disrespects women who dare disagree with him; who does not seek to advance with ethical compromise, but rather prefers to bully – a man with no humility – then Trump is your man. President Trump will not only be Obama’s third term – he will be Obama’s hard-earned and well-deserved legacy.”...
If Trump were to be elected President, I’d bet he’d put some people on it. He went down that road a little and got stonewalled, and of course the MSM tried to make him look foolish. I’m sure someone of his ego remembers, and that he’d like to be vindicated.
Truman and Eisenhower both enacteed deportation policies and made employment of illegal aliens difficult/dangerous economically to the point they left on their own. Look up operation wetback to learn how Eisenhower did it. This could be accomplished again with existing law provided it became national policy to do so.
Are only some laws to be obeyed?
Why do you believe or trust Trump?
Immigration was a big issue? you must be kidding. Nobody was talking about it in meaningful ways. Much like social security discussion it was politically pissing on the third rail.
Which loser do you push now that Walker dropped?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.