Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ckilmer
one of the principle claims of msr reactors is that they will produce electricity at a fraction of the cost of lowest cost coal.

Can you link that claim?

27 posted on 09/11/2015 10:33:15 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: thackney
"Can you link that claim?"

Take a look at the ThorCon site. The last paragraph on the page reads:

Cheaper than Coal

ThorCon requires less resources than a coal plant. Assuming efficient, evidence based regulation, ThorCon can produce reliable, carbon free, electricity at between 3 and 5 cents per kWh depending on scale.

Modern nuclear plants are already competitive with coal, except for the cost of regulation and lawsuits. They produce no mercury or particulates, to boot...
37 posted on 09/11/2015 11:03:47 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Why Molton Salt Reactors will Probably Cost a lot Less

http://nucleargreen.blogspot.com/2012/04/why-molton-sakt-reactors-will-robably_18.html


42 posted on 09/11/2015 11:56:54 AM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

95% of all reactor grade fuel energy content ever produced is resting in storage awaiting reprocessing. Chemical processing can separate the fissionable component from contaminates. A MSR is vastly more effective at total fuel burn. Breeder versions of salt reactors should be reserved for second generation MSR development.


49 posted on 09/13/2015 8:16:05 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson