Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What is Hillary's private server costing the taxpayers
Vanity

Posted on 09/10/2015 7:47:03 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds

One of the many things that goes unreported and not commented upon in the great Hillary Clinton email server evasion is: What has been the cost to the American taxpayer due to her decision to use a private email server during her time at the State Department and how much more will this cost the taxpayer before this is concluded (if ever)? Another question: while she has said it was "permitted" or "allowed" she has never said "WHO permitted this."

Why hasn't the news media raised this question, if even just among themselves? Why isn't congress raising this question as the 19 separate investigations and multitudinous FOIA requests are being pursued? Meanwhile, the State Department claims it cannot complete the work... needs to have all of this discovery consolidated under one judge... doesn't have the manpower (!!!) to produce the records... and needs to consolidate all of this under a "Transparency Czar" who just happens to be a max-contributor ($2700 this past April, I believe) to the Hillary 2016 campaign. You almost can't make this stuff up.

At the end of this process, Mrs. Billary should be handed the bill for all of this along with her sentence to the appropriate Big House. JMHO.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cost; hillary; investigations; server
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 09/10/2015 7:47:03 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

The cost of a wall?


2 posted on 09/10/2015 7:48:58 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

I think it depends on what amount you put on an American life.


3 posted on 09/10/2015 7:49:55 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Cecil the Lion says, Stop the Slaughter of the Baby Humans!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

Cost? How about the cost in national security? I would gladly see the “spending” shifting to indicting her for the CRIMES she has committed. Obvious, tangible crimes.

Sounds like we are in for watching another Washington, DC two-step avoidance performance from the political class protecting itself.

Is ANYBODY home in Washington, DC ???


4 posted on 09/10/2015 7:51:54 AM PDT by EagleUSA (Liberalism removes the significance of everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Is ANYBODY home in Washington, DC ???

Probably not... it's just one big party to them.

5 posted on 09/10/2015 7:56:11 AM PDT by ken in texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

while she has said it was “permitted” or “allowed” she has never said “WHO permitted this.”

This is Clinton speak. No one ever permitted a private server in her home. She didn’t say they did. She was referring to her having private email, not a private server.


6 posted on 09/10/2015 7:59:54 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I was recently permitted to run a stop sign because no one stopped me.


7 posted on 09/10/2015 8:16:43 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

the true cost is in lives, intelligence, and military secrets.

most people don’t seem to understand... she had to take special steps to set up her own email server. she didn’t have to, as she would’ve been given a standard govt account on the first day in office.

she deliberately opened a security hole through which highly classified information was funneled and available for anyone to see... if they have the ip address (which was supplied for a fee... i’m sure)


8 posted on 09/10/2015 8:19:06 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

Costs? Incalculabe. Criminals/socialists/totalitarians will cost us the republic. Witness history. Witness current events Witness Hillary Clinton.


9 posted on 09/10/2015 8:21:01 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

10 posted on 09/10/2015 8:21:40 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

When all is said and done we’ll probably have to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to repair Clintons crimes.

Since we will have NO idea what information our potential enemies have acquired.


11 posted on 09/10/2015 8:23:02 AM PDT by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
The best question for Hillary, which I saw posted here by another Freeper, is "Where are your classified communications?"

She was Secretary of State. Certainly she received and sent classified information. Let's stipulate that it wasn't on her personal server. So where is it?

12 posted on 09/10/2015 8:31:54 AM PDT by TexasKamaAina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasKamaAina

bttt


13 posted on 09/10/2015 8:33:48 AM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
After the blinding flash and the unsettling earthquake, a black, ominous cloud began reaching towards the sky.

Killary's cell phone rang.

Hello?

"Mrs. Crinton?"

Yes

"Tank choo for the info."

click

14 posted on 09/10/2015 8:36:34 AM PDT by upchuck (Drinking buddies and BFFs: Satan, nobama and the AntiChrist. Different subject: Go CRUZ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Finally! A cartoonist who pulls no punches. Love the cankle.


15 posted on 09/10/2015 8:38:37 AM PDT by upchuck (Drinking buddies and BFFs: Satan, nobama and the AntiChrist. Different subject: Go CRUZ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

Congress?!!!

This is joke. Right?


16 posted on 09/10/2015 8:51:01 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

This is Clinton speak. No one ever permitted a private server in her home. She didn’t say they did. She was referring to her having private email, not a private server.

*********************************************************************

That distinction should be made every time Hillary tries to obfuscate the issue.


17 posted on 09/10/2015 8:52:01 AM PDT by Graybeard58 ( Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

Ambassador Stevens would like to say something about the cost of Hillary’s actions.


18 posted on 09/10/2015 8:52:51 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

This is Clinton speak. No one ever permitted a private server in her home. She didn’t say they did. She was referring to her having private email, not a private server.
++++
Actually I don’t think Hillary violated any rules or laws by having a private server in her home. It’s a free country, sort of.

It was the use of that server for government business that, at the minimum, violated State Department rules or policies. While the fact that she did so was widely known within the State Department it is, as you point out, doubtful anyone gave her permission to do so.

Her real problem follows from her sending, receiving an storing TOP SECRET SCI material on that server. That’s jail time for the common man.


19 posted on 09/10/2015 9:05:14 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
she has never said "WHO permitted this."

SHE permitted it.

20 posted on 09/10/2015 9:14:43 AM PDT by ThanhPhero (Khach san La Vang hanh huong tham vieng Maria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson