Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AJFavish

The should NEVER have been a Corker law. PERIOD.


12 posted on 09/09/2015 2:40:25 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (What is the difference between Obama and government bonds? Government bonds will mature someday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Agreed. But right now the Corker law can be used against Obama. He didn’t release the agreement in the statutory time.


15 posted on 09/09/2015 2:45:28 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This legislation actually took power back from the president, and without it, he could have unilaterally implemented the deal immediately. The president never would have been forced to submit the agreement to Congress and there would have been no review and no debate on this critical national security issue.


The above is a paragraph from a letter sent by Sen Corker
on Sept 5 2015. If there was no Corker bill, Obama would have released the funds in July.


37 posted on 09/09/2015 5:05:58 PM PDT by Maris Crane (()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The should NEVER have been a Corker law. PERIOD.

I know. What a complete, utter waste of human skin. What is it with TN and RINO Republicans anyway?

78 posted on 09/10/2015 5:12:00 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Bush [the 90s rock band] for POTUS 2016!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson