Posted on 09/04/2015 10:35:39 AM PDT by jimbo123
“Right now the country ought to act to end the humanitarian crisis of tens of thousands of what are, in effect, orphans and strangers in our land,” he wrote in a Politico op-ed. “The very young among them should find ‘forever families’ right here, right now.”
According to Hewitt, the illegal immigration children “should become Americans” as soon as possible.
Hewitt said “if a child under 13 can identify a parent, the child should be re-united with the parent immediately” while the parent waits to get amnesty from future immigration legislation. If “children under 13 cannot identify a parent, they ought to be relocated to a new, centralized, humane federal facility exclusively for young unaccompanied minors,” Hewitt said, suggesting that in addition to military bases, Congress should also “step forward and authorize the churches of America to do what they are built to do: Shelter the orphan.”
Hewitt recommends that the federal government “authorize adoption by any couple who were (1) certified by a church of (2) at least 250 members and at least five years of existence as a couple of character and standing within the congregation and (3) were under the age of 60, (4) had at least one member of the couple with a full time job of at least five year’s duration and (5) had raised or were presently raising at least one child who had achieved any normal set of measurements.”
If that happens, he argues that “the crisis over the effectively orphaned children would be over within months” because “Americans from all over the country would step up to care for these children, to give them new ‘forever families.'”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
And the ones who flood here after the first amnesty?
They get amnesty too?
And the ones after that?
A week after such an official announcement, a flood of unaccompanied minor children will begin to flood across the border.
And if the church has 249 members, Hugh?
So, is HH a Jebby boy?
Destroying our demographic. Per plan.
Another writer who doesn't understand the difference between an American and a US citizen. -Tom
Facts:
1) Except in the very odd/exceptional election year of 1964, the Dems haven’t cracked 50% of the whites in a Presidential election since 1932.
2) Once the ‘64 election was over, the Dems understood that they would never win another Presidential election again unless the Republicans REALLY screwed up...or unless they changed the electorate in a dramatic way.
3) The Dems, courtesy of Bobby Kennedy who wrote the law, and Teddy Kennedy who pushed it in the Senate, passed the 1965 Immigration Act. That law dramatically reduced immigration from our then-traditional large sources of immigrants - England, Ireland, Holland, Germany, etc. - and replaced them with vast numbers of Turd Worlders...whom everyone knows vote around 80% for Dems, and will continue to do so for the rest of their lives, as new immigrants have traditionally done.
4) As a result of the ‘65 Act, and due to the Dem’s outright lying in ‘86 regarding an effective (or any) fence, there are now probably 30 - 40 million illegals in this nation. Note that the (probably low-ball) figure in 2005 was 11 million...we have 2-3 million come in every year, so simple math says that the number is actually somewhere between 31 and 41 million). If any substantial portion of these people ever become citizens, then the Dems will have accomplished a complete shift of the electorate, and will be virtually invincible on the national level. Every state will become like California, both politically and economically - which is to say, overwhelming Dem and broke. But at least if you don’t like California now, you can leave for a better place without much trouble - where are you going to go if EVERY state is like that?
5) Every Republican, and every Conservative voter MUST UNDERSTAND that if such a state of affairs comes to be, NO OTHER ISSUE WILL MATTER AT ALL, because we will ALWAYS AND FOREVER lose on those issues. Immigration is THE issue of this election, and this election is as critical as the 1860 election was - and for the same reason, because it will determine whether this nation continues on as it has existed in the past, or becomes a new and unrecognizable entity that simply occupies the same geographic territory.
Please wake up, and help others to do so by sending them this post (or recommending “Adios America” to them). It really is THAT important.
What, is that idiot running for office? We don’t need any more imports, we can’t take care of our own! OUT!
No way should these “kids” be allowed to stay here. It would only bring more of them. They should be sent back immediately. To remain an independent country, one has to control who is admitted. This should not be done by foreign countries or groups.
And this amnesty clown is moderating the next debate.
Don’t really care what Hugh Hewitt thinks or says. There are laws in place that detail how people should immigrate to this country. Those who don’t follow that process should leave. Hugh just slapped the face of hundreds of thousands of people who did the right thing and/or are in the process of immigrating the right way. I have zero sympathy for the rest of them. They are breaking the law and should be treated as such.
Do you have a time machine ? Is it set for 2012 ?
The reason I ask is because there ALREADY was an OFFICIAL ANNOUNCMENT (done personally by Joe Biden) and the flood of Unaccompanied minor children has been flooding across the border for a year.
Right now the country ought to act to end the humanitarian crisis of tens of thousands of what are, in effect, run-aways in our land and return them to their families in their home countries.
We are going down. Its time to get back to acknowledging cold hard realities and set policy based upon those. No more policy setting by feelings.
Hugh Hewitt sounds like he would gladly sell out this country. I would not trust him.
All children need to be with their parents wherever their parents end up because of their legal status. So far birthright citizenship confers just that, citizenship, not the right to stay or be cared for in the states.
How many millions is Hugh offering to adopt?
Because their low-life parents and relatives would never think about trying to join them here — right Hugh?
I agree.
Hope you have a big back yard and a LOT of bedrooms in YOUR house, Hugh...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.