Posted on 09/02/2015 9:11:47 AM PDT by Hojczyk
Herridge also hears about a conflict of interest in the designation process. A conflict over that roped in a familiar name:
Fox News is told there were internal department complaints that Duval, and a second lawyer also linked to Kendall, gave at the very least the appearance of a conflict of interest during the email review. A State Department spokesman did not dispute the basic facts of the incident, confirming to Fox News the disagreement over the four classified emails as well as the internal complaints. But the spokesman said the concerns were unfounded.
The whistleblowers told intelligence community officials that they did not agree with the B5 changes, and the changes had the effect of shielding the full extent of classified content on the server. The incident was referenced in a Washington Times report mid-August, but this is the first time fuller details have been available. Because the emails are now marked B5, or deliberative, it is impossible to know the content and relevance to the congressional and FBI investigations.
The internal State Department disagreement was so significant that it rose to the level of Under Secretary for Management Patrick Kennedy, who is deeply involved in the email controversy, as Clinton’s server arrangement required his formal signoff or tacit approval. Asked who signed off on the private server on Tuesday, State Department spokesman Mark Toner said, “I personally don’t know.”
What a shock! Kennedy, who was also involved in the Benghazi scandal, is the point man for determining what Congress — and the FBI, apparently — does and does not see. That may change, however, if the FBI manages to restore the original server files or accesses the rump files from David Kendall’s thumb drives that contain the post-deletion e-mails handed over to State.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Stupid, dishonest, a blind ideologue, or all of the above.
Where is Craig Livingstone these days?
[“You’d have to be really, really stupid” to buy Hillary’s “ridiculous” denials]
Well, they just described some percentage of America voters.
I like Hillary’s “Wiped it? You mean like with a cloth?”.
One had to be really, really stupid to support her up to that point.
Now, one has to be really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really (tiring out) stupid to support Hillary.
But then Benghazi 2012 proved that all too well. Not that we didn’t know beforehand.
Great Headline.
Reminds me of a book Hillary wrote....
It takes a Village
Idiot to believe my Husband.
Keep in mind that people voted Obama to a second term.
Seems there are a lot of really really stupid people out there.....
They may be stupid too, but I believe that the real problem is, "I want things that someone else has worked for. Gimme, gimme, gimme, government."
Hell, 34 liberals were really really stupid buying into the president’s really really stupid iran deal-
lol
There is no shortage of stupid.
Hillary's supporters really, really are..............
And I want an audit of their finances right now, ongoing and for them to empty their pockets to show us how many pieces of silver they got for their doing so!
As much as I held in contempt Bishop Willard from Planet Kolob, in the 2012 selection cycle he spoke an unspeakable truth:
Forty-seven percent of the nation will ALWAYS vote Left, no matter what.
Who said liberals were smart other than when you hear them talking to themselves about how much smarter they are than everyone else...
The headline says it all. We have a majority of stupid people in this nation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
