[Magnum44]

Obama wouldn't know the scientific process if it crawled up and bit him in the arse.

[Seaplaner]

Interestingly, "global warming" does not even qualify as a hypothesis. There is no actual observation of significant warming or sea level changes, there is only computer modeling.

What gets me, however, is that global warming/climate change is put forth in non-scientific fashion. If someone were to develop a hypothesis, perform the experiments, and validate the hypothesis, the next step is to invite skeptics to review the data and to duplicate the experiments.

Furthermore, if someone were to find the hypothesis (global warming, in this case) not valid, then that should be GOOD news, n'est ce pas?

.

[Rebelbase]

Your flow chart left out the “file a patent” step between Hypothesis is true and report your results for peer review.