Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oatka

Not everyone agrees this was their goal.

I see them facing reality. At $100 per barrel, current technology conditions meant significant growing production from other sources, including other energy sources. There wasn’t any real expectation for their income to continue unchanged.

If they reduce production to keep prices ~$100, they would have to continue making those cuts while other gained.

It has been a rough ride down for most that ride this rollercoaster. But the expectation it wouldn’t change was naive. Only a matter of when and how far. Both the speed and the depth of the drop surprised me.


15 posted on 09/01/2015 8:56:25 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: thackney

Both the speed and the depth of the drop surprised me
__________________

That is how a downturn happens - every time. One day you’re rolling in clover, the next you are not.

Even though the oil companies were raking it in - so were those employed directly or indirectly, by the industry. The smart ones opened savings accounts and didn’t blow the largess.


18 posted on 09/01/2015 9:51:23 AM PDT by KittenClaws ( Normalcy Bias. Do you have it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson