Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anger builds at EPA over radioactive landfill
The Hill ^ | August 29, 2015 | Timothy Cama

Posted on 08/30/2015 8:03:30 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Leaders in a St. Louis suburb are urgently calling on top Obama administration officials to quickly clean up a landfill with radioactive waste that they believe could catch fire.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been working for 25 years on the West Lake Landfill in Bridgeton, Mo., which has housed barium sulfate waste from the Manhattan Project since the 1970s.

The EPA is still studying the site and considering a wide range of actions to contain the radioactive material under its Superfund program for cleaning severe environmental contamination.

But with an underground, smoldering fire in an adjacent landfill, residents and leaders say it’s only a matter of time before the flames hits the radioactive waste, potentially sending it airborne and spreading it in an unpredictable way. “What we have is an emergency,” said Ed Smith, energy program director with the Missouri Coalition for the Environment. “It’s a slow-moving emergency.”

Dawn Chapman, an organize of local activist group Just Moms STL, along with Byron DeLear of Energy Equity Funding, called directly on President Obama to act in a recent St. Louis Post-Dispatch opinion piece.

Matt LaVanchy, a local fire department official, told radio station KTRS that he believes the fire could be less than 1,000 feet from the radioactive material, and is trying to train firefighters for possible outcomes.

“There’s a possibility, the potential, of radioactive material being carried away by the result of the smoldering or the combustion event,” he said.

Residents have been working closely with Sens. Claire McCaskill (D) and Roy Blunt (R) and Reps. Lacy Clay (D) and Ann Wagner (R), who have written multiple letters and taken other action to put pressure on the Obama administration to take care of the problem.

Beyond the fire risk, locals argue that the radioactive material could also be compromised by floods, tornadoes, earthquakes or other disasters.

Angered with what they see as EPA’s slow movement on the matter, local leaders want the Army Corps of Engineers to take over as the lead agency overseeing the radioactive waste.

The Army Corps oversees the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP), which is in charge of remediation for many radioactive contaminated sites that resulted from Department of Energy research and programs. It is helping the EPA currently, but it is not the main agency.

That includes numerous sites in and around St. Louis that were discovered in the early 1990s to have waste that was illegally dumped by Mallinckrodt Inc., which enriched uranium for the Manhattan Project.

“Given that this is a problem that began with the federal government, we believe that the Corps of Engineers is the best suited entity to handle West Lake Landfill,” said Smith, whose group has been communicating with the White House to encourage President Obama to hand over the site to the Army Corps.

“We believe that it would be within the power of the president to issue an executive order to clean up the bureaucratic administrative mess at West Lake Landfill, put one government agency in charge and utilize the EPA, Missouri Department of Natural Resources, what have you, as experts on these issues while having one quarterback instead of two,” he continued.

The congressional delegation made a similar plea in a July letter to the EPA.

“Given the Corps’ expertise in this area, and the local community’s faith in the Corps’ FUSRAP mission, we request that the EPA consider contracting directly with the Corps to handle any and all remediation needed at the site,” they wrote.

A spokesman for the White House said it is aware of the pleas from the area, but would not say if anything will happen.

The EPA says it hears all of the concerns and it is working diligently on overseeing the actions of Republic Services, the company that currently owns the West Lake Landfill, but that the effort will take time.

“We absolutely understand their frustrations. We know that this seems like it is taking a long time,” said Chris Whitley, spokesman for the EPA’s region 7, which includes Missouri. “But it boils down to this: good science takes time, and it cannot be rushed.”

The EPA also says the situation is not as urgent or dire as some have made it out to be.

The landfill garbage, Whitley said, is not actually on fire but only smoldering, a common occurrence, and the agency does not believe local residents are in immediate risk.

“We have yet to find issues that indicate that anything at the landfill site is causing exposures to anyone in the community,” he said, adding that the EPA is well aware of the smoldering waste and its consequences.

The EPA proposed in 2008 to require that the radioactive material be permanently capped. But in the face of opposition, officials decided to consider other options, and Whitley predicted that the agency will propose one within a year.

But Whitley warned against moving the site to Army Corps jurisdiction. He said it is not within EPA’s power to do that, and even if it could, it would be enormously expensive.

Republic Services, which is the main party responsible for the cleanup, said it is working effectively with the EPA.

“That robust, normal Superfund process is very mature and, left alone, will produce a fully protective remedy in the shortest time without requiring taxpayers to pay the entire cost,” said Russ Knocke, a company spokesman. “A transfer to FUSRAP would cause needless delay, and is likely to waste taxpayer dollars for no reason.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: armycorps; bandname; bariumsulfate; bridgeton; environment; epa; erinbrockovich; fire; goldkingmine; justmomsstl; manhattanproject; navajonation; radioactive; radioactivelandfill; stlouis; superfund; water; westlakelandfill; whitehous
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 08/30/2015 8:03:30 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

PING!


2 posted on 08/30/2015 8:05:18 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY; abner; Abundy; AGreatPer; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; alisasny; ALlRightAllTheTime; ...

PING!


3 posted on 08/30/2015 8:05:38 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Democrats and GOP-e: a difference of degree, not philosophy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
First question from Lord Foul is "Valerie are any muslims impacted by the situation?"
4 posted on 08/30/2015 8:10:41 PM PDT by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The opportunity for graft is diminishing for this project, so it won’t get much attention from Obama.


5 posted on 08/30/2015 8:10:49 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Voting is acting white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Good. The more general anger at the EPA’s screwups while they continue to preach their extremist branch of the Green religion the better.


6 posted on 08/30/2015 8:10:59 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
“The congressional delegation made a similar plea in a July letter to the EPA." What pure unadulterated crap. The slave has become the master. Abolish this worthless agency whose only purpose is to further its own existence at the expense of the common man. Taxation without representation is the classic definition of tyranny. Abolish this evil agency, it has nothing to do with ‘protecting’ the environment. What happened to the Animus river? Where has that gone and did the “environmental protection agency” “protect” that river? As BJ Bill Clinton once said: “it's time for a change.”
7 posted on 08/30/2015 8:14:36 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Chris Whitley, EPA region 7: "Good science takes time, and it cannot be rushed.”

Right. The EPA rushed the botched Gold King mine near Silverton, CO causing disaster. Now they aren' going to rush this and cause another disaster.

8 posted on 08/30/2015 8:29:41 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Would Yucca Mountain have been a good site for this type waste?

From wiki:

Since 2009, the Obama administration has been attempting to close the Yucca Mountain repository, despite current US law that designates Yucca Mountain as the nation’s nuclear waste repository.


9 posted on 08/30/2015 8:43:26 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“...to quickly clean up a landfill with radioactive waste that they believe could catch fire.”

This kids got a winner of a lawsuit against any school that graduated him, unless it was Godzilla U.


10 posted on 08/30/2015 8:52:05 PM PDT by This_far (AN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
What we have is an emergency,” said Ed Smith, energy program director with the Missouri Coalition for the Environment. “It’s a slow-moving emergency.”

Well, that doesn't necessarily require a slow moving solution.

11 posted on 08/30/2015 9:02:03 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fungi; Tolerance Sucks Rocks
George Bush's EPA plan was to cap it and that only cost $41 million at the time, but the locals didn't like that solution, so EPA had to back up and start over.

St Louis wants this transferred over to the Corp of Engineers who would dig it up, haul it, and dump it in Utah or Nevada. But that is probably going to cost $500 million, plus it takes an act of Congress to transfer it over to the Corp.

12 posted on 08/30/2015 9:29:08 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

They’ve only been studying and considering it for twenty-five years?


13 posted on 08/30/2015 9:39:36 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

They can rush action on global warming, because they can’t screw up something that doesn’t exist.


14 posted on 08/30/2015 9:41:51 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

I’ve dealt with the Corp of Engineers for decades and I can attest to the fact that those boys really know how to complicate a project and drive the cost into the stratosphere.


15 posted on 08/30/2015 9:48:25 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Well the EPA is done messing up rivers in Colorado and surrounding areas, move on to the next screw up. One epic fail after the next.


16 posted on 08/30/2015 10:04:27 PM PDT by bluejean (The lunatics are running the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Gee, they’ll be really p!ssed off if the go to Granite City across the river.


17 posted on 08/30/2015 10:12:22 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

No doubt entire careers have been spent on this.


18 posted on 08/30/2015 10:19:25 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Great big piece of the reporting puzzle is missing.

How much activity are we talking about AND what are the isotopes of barium present?

Without those two, this is merely normal, scare the people ‘news’.

Breaking news!!!! Every single banana, in every single supermarket, in every single town in America is Radioactive!!!! What are we gonna do? (Cue the O Noes guys)


19 posted on 08/31/2015 5:00:32 AM PDT by RoadGumby (This is not where I belong, Take this world and give me Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoadGumby

I’ve got it! I’ve got it! I FIGURED OUT WHAT IS CAUSING “GLOBAL WARMING”

“....with an underground, smoldering fire in an adjacent landfill, residents and leaders say it’s only a matter of time before the flames hits the radioactive waste, potentially sending it airborne and spreading it in an unpredictable way.”..........

Yepper, global warming alright.........


20 posted on 08/31/2015 5:17:23 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson