[tinyowl]

Not something I care deeply about ... but I just noticed reading that headline ... that I haven’t read any of the cheating women’s names ... is that just because there are far fewer of them / women aren’t as stupid as men when it comes to exposing themselves, no pun intended, as cheaters ... hence the pool of likely interesting names is empty?

Just curious ...

[redgolum]

It might be because the data dump was edited.

Millions of men, many divorces, something was going on.

[dsrtsage]

Why would a woman (unless she looks like Rosie O’Donnel) ever need to go to a website to find sex anyway? Unless a woman is unbelievably hideously ugly, all she has to do is go out alone, and within 5 minutes she will have many men talking to her.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

I would say it is probably because the females who actually signed up were there to find men who would pay them for their company. In other words, they were hookers.

For the most part hookers are not interesting people.

[Jonty30]

It’s just easier for women to cheat than men. A woman only needs to go to the local singles bar on any night she is alone. Men, unless they are in the top 5% of attractiveness, have to work at establishing relationships with women to generate interest. Sites, like Madison or Plenty of Fish, cuts the amount of work needed because the women are self-selected and open to the possibilities.