I cannot help but wonder the following: If the endangered animal in question were something that would undermine over a hundred years of "science" - something like, say, a pterodactyl - would these university professors still be gung ho in favor of protections and awareness programs?
“If the endangered animal in question were something that would undermine over a hundred years of “science” - something like, say, a pterodactyl - would these university professors still be gung ho in favor of protections and awareness programs? “
Darwin’s law in action can be a good thing like destroying worthless/bloated university staffs.