...we see no principled way to carve out the Second Amendment and say that the unauthorized ...are excluded...
Looks like this Court decision could be used for the people in oppressive gun law states that carve up the Second Amendment, liberal bastions on the east and left coasts. Since this is a 7th Circuit Case, it is binding only in 7th Circuit states.
The Second Amendment only protects an existing natural right, it doesn’t establish or grant it. Every person anywhere in the world is born with the right to keep and bear arms, the only question is how badly that right is trampled by government.
I’m in favor of repeal of every last part of 18 USC 922, except where a suspected or convicted criminal has been stripped of his or her rights through the due process of law - why isn’t every pro-gun person as well?