To: Erik Latranyi
That’s what jumped out to me as well.
Possession of a cartridge, a .22 at that, is enough to be charged for having a firearm? This is layers of absurdity.
13 posted on
08/26/2015 4:11:58 AM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: lepton
Possession of a cartridge, a .22 at that, is enough to be charged for having a firearm? This is layers of absurdity.This is a political agenda in action.
The liberal prosecutors see nothing wrong with being illegal, but everything wrong with possessing ammunition.
DUI has been made horrible. But try DUI while in possession of a firearm. It is magnified 1000x
14 posted on
08/26/2015 4:14:26 AM PDT by
Erik Latranyi
(Trump - He likes progressive taxes and criticizes Walker for not raising taxes in WI)
To: lepton
Possession of a cartridge, a .22 at that, is enough to be charged for having a firearm? This is layers of absurdity. In DC they charge people for possession of spent casings and empty shotgun shell hulls..
36 posted on
08/26/2015 7:16:27 AM PDT by
OldMissileer
(Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
To: lepton
"Possession of a cartridge, a .22 at that, is enough to be charged for having a firearm? This is layers of absurdity." No. Bad reporting. The law also forbids possession of ammunition.
47 posted on
08/26/2015 12:20:07 PM PDT by
mlo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson