Posted on 08/25/2015 2:12:40 AM PDT by markomalley
Christians in the U.S. worry that the day may be coming when they will no longer be able to freely speak their minds about their faith. But that day has already arrived in Canada, Europe, and the U.K.
In 2008, a Canadian Human Rights panel imposed a $5,000 fine on the Reverend Stephen Boisson for a letter he had written in 2002 to a small newspaper describing homosexual activists as immoral (the ruling was eventually overturned by a higher court). In the same year (2002), an Ontario court ordered a Catholic school to admit a homosexual teen and his older male lover to the school prom. In 2004, a Swedish pastor was sentenced to a month in prison for a sermon that criticized homosexuality. A year before that, Irish clergy were given notice that they could be prosecuted if they distributed a Vatican publication on same-sex relationships.
As in other parts of the world, homosexuals in the U.S are a protected class. Criticizing them from the pulpit (or any other venue) may soon be considered a hate crime. But homosexuals arent the only privileged group. In much of the Western world, Muslims have also acquired a most-favored status. Once again, the trend is most pronounced in Canada and across the Atlantic. Consider two recent headlines:
This August, James McConnell, an Evangelical Christian pastor, was charged by a Belfast court with making grossly offensive remarks about Islam. Local Muslims complained that on May 18, the Reverend McConnell had preached a sermon to his large congregation describing Islam as heathen and satanic McConnell, who rejected an informed consent warning that would have allowed him to avoid prosecution, now faces six months in prison.
In an interview with the Belfast Telegraph, McConnell said he had no hate for Muslims: My church funds medical care for 1,200 Muslim children in Kenya and Ethiopia. Ive no hatred in my heart for Muslims, but I wont be stopped from preaching against Islam. Ironically, Dr. Raied al-Wazzan, the director of the Belfast Islamic Center and the chief complainant against McConnell, does seem to bear some animus against Christians. Speaking to the BBC in January 2015, he said, Since the Islamic State took over, it [Mosul] has become the most peaceful city in the world. That, after the Islamic State had killed or expelled all of Mosuls Christian community of 60,000.
Al-Wazzan seems to be endorsing genocide. Why isnt he on trial for hate speech? Writing in the Belfast Telegraph, Susan Breen, an atheist journalist, raises that very question: The fact that Dr. Al-Wazzan will be in the witness box, and not in the dock himself, reinforces Christians belief it is they alone who are being victimized and persecuted in our society.
Rev. McConnell is certainly better off living in Belfast than in Mosul. But, as evidenced by his experience and by the recent Irish vote in favor of same-sex marriage, Ireland seems increasingly inhospitable to Christians and their inflammatory opinions. The trouble is, Pastor McConnell would probably not have fared much better in other parts of the Western world.
Take Canada. Were grown accustomed to thinking of our neighbor to the north as a more liberal place than the U.S. But these days, its difficult to distinguish a liberal from a fascist. Canadian Human Rights Commissions have already put two prominent Canadian citizens (Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant) on trial for criticizing Islam. Fortunately, Steyn and Levant prevailed and even managed to bring about a repeal of the Canadian law which gave Human Rights Commissions the authority to conduct Star Chamber-style inquiries.
However, the liberalists are at it again. This summer a bill was introduced that would give new powers to the Quebec Human Rights Commission (QHRC) to combat hate speech and any speech that promotes fear of the other. The Commissions president, Jacques Fremont, explained he would use the powers to sue people who would write against the Islamic religion on a website or on a Facebook page.
Pastor McConnells remarks could be construed as promoting fear of the other, but so could a lot of other things in our loose-constructionist societies. Anything but the most innocuous remarks about Islam and homosexuality can be interpreted as promoting fear of the other. And its not just pastors in pulpits who need to worry. If the bill is passed, any Canadian citizen expressing an incorrect opinion on a website or Facebook page could be liable to prosecution.
The upshot is that its becoming increasingly difficult to discuss two of the most important issues of our time. In their own ways, both the marriage revolution movement and the Islamist movement pose major threats to civilization. The danger is that, for fear of ending up in court, few will dare to openly acknowledge the threats.
You may counter that the Reverend McConnell wouldnt be facing jail if he had chosen his words more carefullysomething a bit less provocative than heathen and satanic. There are two replies. First, what business is it of the State what he says? Short of inciting a mob with pitchforks and torches to attack the local mosque or church, the representatives of one religion ought to be free to criticize another religion. Freedom of religion should include the right to say what you think is wrong with another religion. Or, as McConnell put it, I would defend the right of any Muslim cleric to preach against me or Christianity. Letting the State sit in judgment on sermons is tantamount to letting the State tell the Church what it can and cannot believe.
Second, there is no end to the things that Muslim leaders find offensive. In Saudi Arabia, its offensive for Christians to build a church. In some Muslim countries its offensive when Christians use the word Allah, even though that is the word they have traditionally used for God. When Pope Benedict quoted a medieval emperors assessment of Muhammad, Muslims around the world rioted in protest. In Sudan, an English woman was put in jail and almost lost her life for letting her students name the class teddy bear Muhammad. At this point, most pastors will have figured out that anything other than greeting-card type platitudes about Islam will be considered offensive. And so most will choose to remain completely silent on the issue.
But that is the same mistake many pastors and certainly the vast majority of priests made about homosexuality and same-sex marriage. They chose to remain silent on these issues. As a result, a good many Christians came to the conclusion that the same-sex marriage debate wasnt that important. Now, thanks in part to the silence of so many Christians, gay activists are in a position to dictate to Christian florists, photographers, and bakers. By now, it should be apparent that the gay assault on Christianity has nothing to do with provocative Christians and everything to do with the gay activist agenda. There is nothing provocative about a Christian baker politely declining to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple, especially when the couple had other options. On the contrary, the gay couple were deliberately attempting to provoke a predictable reaction from the baker so that they could proceed with a lawsuit.
Lets hope that Christian pastors will exercise prudence when speaking about Islam. But for them to remain silent about the threat from Islam will lead many Christians to conclude, as they did with the issue of same-sex marriage, that there is no real danger to church or society. The tables have already been turned on Christians who failed to understand the gay activist agenda. It is their rights, not the rights of gays, that are now at risk. Likewise, Christians who fail to understand the global Islamist agenda will have far more to fret about than pastors who dont observe the niceties of non-offensive language.
Freedom was nice while it lasted.
>> Christians in the U.S. worry that the day may be coming when they will no longer be able to freely speak their minds about their faith.
... that day MAY come?
That day WILL come. That day MUST come.
“Remember what I told you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also.” — Jesus, as recorded by St. John (15:20)
“But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty... Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, while evil people and impostors will go on from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived.” — St. Paul from his second letter to Timothy (3:1,12)
This is a time of purifiying. Of seperating the wheat from the chaff. The fruit from the weeds. It is a time of refining pure metal and burning off the impurities.
width="200">
The tax exempt status of true Christians churches will soon be removed, and then will come the "visits" from "Human Rights" representatives of the governments (state, local, Federal). Then, pastors will be arrested, along with congregations.
Stand with Jesus.
Somehow liberals never fall foul of the law with hate speech for Christians...
Lets hope that Christian pastors will exercise prudence when speaking about Islam
**********************************************************************
No, lets hope they tell the truth about islam, loud, long and often.
+1
**********************************************************************
No, lets hope they tell the truth about islam, loud, long and often.
PRUDENCE. Correct knowledge about things to be done or, more broadly, the knowledge of things that ought to be done and of things that ought to be avoided. It is the intellectual virtue whereby a human being recognizes in any matter at hand what is good and what is evil. In this sense, it is the moral virtue that enables a person to devise, choose, and prepare suitable means for the attainment of any purpose or the avoidance of any evil. Prudence resides in the practical intellect and is both acquired by one's own acts and infused at the same time as sanctifying grace. It may be said to be natural as developed by us, and supernatural because conferred by God. As an act of virtue, prudence involves three stages of mental operation: to take counsel carefully with oneself and from others; to judge correctly on the basis of the evidence at hand; and to direct the rest of one's activity according to the norms determined after a prudent judgment has been made.
Since Islam is evil, it seems like the prudent act would be to identify it as such and to eradicate it. The trick (and where real prudence lies) is to do so without embracing (some other form of) evil yourself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.