Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: smokingfrog
Example: If that had been three American women on the French train — would the gunman have been subdued?
2 posted on
08/22/2015 4:27:40 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: smokingfrog
Women will NEVER be ready for combat.
It is women’s place in life to give and nurture life, not to take it.
A society that sends its women to fight before it sends its non-shaving boys and cane-borne old men deserves to be destroyed, and will be by societies that do not make that mistake.
3 posted on
08/22/2015 4:28:10 PM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: smokingfrog
What a load of hogwash. A country that send it’s women to do its fighting is a country that will be defeated.
5 posted on
08/22/2015 4:31:46 PM PDT by
Bryan24
(When in doubt, move to the right..........)
To: smokingfrog
Women don't belong in Combat.
And Neither do Men >:'(
What happens to our Women when some Derkastani Jihadi gets his blood up and finds one of our Women soldiers?
What Happens when a city is Sacked? You have more women raped than one would ever care to count.
6 posted on
08/22/2015 4:31:51 PM PDT by
KC_Lion
(This Millennial is for Cruz!)
To: smokingfrog
Still no.
Still, always no.
7 posted on
08/22/2015 4:35:17 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: smokingfrog
To: smokingfrog
>>women are capable of the combat skills necessary to fight alongside their male counterparts.
Then why do we have to listen to all the stories of “rape culture” in the military and on campuses? If women are ready for combat, then rapists should be the first to know.
10 posted on
08/22/2015 4:38:10 PM PDT by
Bryanw92
(Sic semper tyrannis)
To: smokingfrog
Unlike the author, I served in the Army. He or she is full of it.
11 posted on
08/22/2015 4:38:57 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(TED CRUZ. You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
To: smokingfrog
Claptrap. Having two women successfully complete Ranger School doesn’t in any way demonstrate that women can and should serve in combat. Two women out of thousands does not mean that all women can be infantry or even artillery personnel in the arduous world of direct combat.
Combat is killing and being killed. It isn’t a “job”; it’s a mission that cannot be diluted or distracted and still result in success. It’s already hard to get young men to learn how to fight and kill. Even with the best, hardest training, a certain percentage of men can never successfully do more than make noise and maybe survive.
Adding women to units will not improve combat effectiveness but more than likely distract and diminish combat effectiveness. Units that are less effective lose more lives and lose fights.
Will the families of the dead be grateful that we decided to put women into combat units?
13 posted on
08/22/2015 4:39:43 PM PDT by
Chainmail
(A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
To: smokingfrog
Anu Bhagwati, a former Marine Corps Captain, is the founder of Service Womens Action Network, which is a plaintiff in Hegar v. Carter, a lawsuit filed in 2012 by service women to repeal the combat exclusion policy.
To: smokingfrog
Do we understand the difference between men and women? Not today. But perhaps something will teach us the difference.
Do we understand the importance of character? Not today. But perhaps something will teach us the importance.
Do we understand the value of real leadership and responsibility? Not today. But perhaps something will teach us to recall these things.
I wouldn't really wish this on the country, but I will say this: We will not be a serious country again until we go through a horrible war and suffer something like a half million casualties.
We need a return to clear thinking and an appreciation of Quality. But that will not happen until we suffer, and come to understand what the lack of quality really means.
16 posted on
08/22/2015 4:41:55 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Cruz is still my #1, but Trump is impressing the hell out of me.)
To: smokingfrog
Ok. Make an entire female battalion and send them to Fallujah or the Korengal
18 posted on
08/22/2015 4:42:14 PM PDT by
PGR88
To: smokingfrog
The NY TIMES is the mouthpiece for the Obama White House.
To: smokingfrog
21 posted on
08/22/2015 4:43:36 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: smokingfrog
The question now is whether to give women the opportunity to compete for coveted combat arms assignments, such as infantry and special forces. COVETED ?
22 posted on
08/22/2015 4:43:56 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: smokingfrog
So a year ago the standards were lowered, 36 women applied, and now almost a year later two have graduated. Not sure how many others applied or how many others failed Ranger School.
Three Dozen woman apply to Ranger school
24 posted on
08/22/2015 4:44:11 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(This tagline lists all of Hilary's accomplishments............................)
To: smokingfrog
Straight from the mouth of Anu Bhagwati so it must be must be true. I wonder if Anu is ready to get her @$$ blown to bits while daddy is at home babysitting the kids. Myth my @$$.
26 posted on
08/22/2015 4:45:18 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Cecil the Lion says, Stop the Slaughter of the Baby Humans!!!)
To: smokingfrog
But as of yet, none of these female warriors can legally be assigned to infantry or other combat arms billets for which they have proved themselves qualified
You prove you are qualified for combat by being in combat not going through school. That applies to men as well as women..
30 posted on
08/22/2015 4:54:01 PM PDT by
48th SPS Crusader
(I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
To: smokingfrog
There is one interesting note on human fertility and births. Look up the birthrate for male and female births and you will always find (99.99%) of the time that males outnumber females born by a ratio of 1.04 to 1. Ever wonder why? Go to the CIA website and peruse the birthrate for any country. Ever wonder why? I have an answer but in this day and time it will be considered sexist.
31 posted on
08/22/2015 4:54:24 PM PDT by
Fungi
To: smokingfrog
Yeah,,,,,riiiiiiight. Then I want GIRLS to have to REGISTER with the DRAFT when they turn 18!!!! NO EXCEPTIONS! WHY do guys have to register when girls don’t have to??? NOT FAIR!!!
32 posted on
08/22/2015 4:55:15 PM PDT by
Ann Archy
(ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson