Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Isara

His use of the words “We” and “Us” say a lot about the kind of man Ted Cruz is.


2 posted on 08/22/2015 7:10:51 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek

The liberals soil themselves at the mention of the religious right.


8 posted on 08/22/2015 8:27:34 AM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

freedom of the spoken word...freedom of the printed/published/written word.....freedom of the CHURCH..ie “an establishment of religion”. Not two opposing clauses which cancel each other out being both “for” & “against” religion....but meant to represent one cogent thought...that religion is “good” makes people moral, & law-abiding and the church is a check & balance on the power of the state-same as the press—and needs specific protection from goverment in the Bill of Rights. The first amendment doesn’t protect people from the Church, it protects the people & the states & the press & the church from the national government...all government. Congress shall make no law having to do with (ie with respect to/respecting) a church or other place of worship,(ie a religious establishment/an establishment of religion) or preventing the free exercise, thereof


9 posted on 08/22/2015 8:37:41 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek

AND...if Congress shall make no law.........the same prohibition applies to courts of law which make decisions carrying the weight of law...or even carrying the weight of being in-effect illegal Constitutional amendments. Both Roe v Wade (which de-regulated abortion doctors who are licensed by the states & aren’t above the law) & the recent decisions on same-sex marriage & even on Obamacare...were cases where judges/courts were allowed to illegally amend the United States Constitution ..which only can be amended by supermajority of the people. If judges are given the power to decide how much power judges are given by the Constitution, then there are no checks or balances on high courts & judges...who soon decide that nobody can stop them from illegally amending the Constitution to force states to license same-sex marriage.....or to declare all takings may be called “taxes”, then declare that all taxes are unconstitutional...ignoring all the rights of the people & restrictions against taxes & takings already in the U.S> Constitution.....Obamacare.


10 posted on 08/22/2015 8:44:01 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson