The Kraut Hammer was nailed.
Of course he was, if he was quoting the 14th Amendment.I believe it was the 39th Congress (I could be wrong) in 1866 that debated the proposed 14th Amendment at length.
There was not a mention of anchor babies or the power of executive amnesty for illegal aliens ...
NONE. ZIP. NADA.
ALL THE CONGRESSIONAL DEBATES ARE ACCESSIBLE IN THE RECORD OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
Anybody who really cares to look can spend the hours to review ALL the congressional debates between 1865 and 1870.
The only thing that IS mentioned is that the House has the power to define citizenship. Period.
Whatever the Supreme Court may have "decided" in the past was not based on any power Constitutionally granted to either the Supreme Court or to the Executive.
In fact, there is serious question about the legitimacy (and legality!) of the Supreme Court during reconstruction.
I guess it's easier to bloviate than to do serious research; having high school volunteers do it for you isn't gonna cut it, Mr. O'Bloviator and friend.