[March 11, 2015] Obama’s Surrender to Iran At the expense of America and Israel

It is becoming increasingly clear that Obama’s agenda in the Middle East is to help the Islamists regain the land they once controlled but lost in 1924 with the fall of the Ottoman Empire.

The Arab Spring was not a movement to replace ruthless dictators with democratic governments. It was an Islamic movement to replace secular governments with Islamic ones.

Step by step, this administration is helping to establish the Islamists’ dream of a revived caliphate, or “Pan Arabic Islamic Union” as it has been called by Islamist leaders recently.

There is a mistaken school of thought that believes such an Islamic Union would function like an Arabic European Union, growing their economies and enabling them to take their place among the other nations of the world as equals.

This school neglects to answer the most salient question: How do you contain a movement that recognizes no borders but its own and is compelled by dint of faith to dominate the rest of the world or die in the effort?

Unfortunately, the primary opposition to this plan isn’t coming from the American people. Sadly, much of America is suffering from confusion, ignorance, self-loathing and a dedication to bending over backwards in an attempt to avoid the confrontation that looms ahead.

Rather than marshaling a strong core of support for the hard choices that must be made, our administration is creating a huge chasm between citizens over trivialities and over-amplified slights. We are far weaker for it.

One might ask then, who is opposing the mighty President of the United States? Who dares stand in the way of the Nobel Peace prize winner “Barack Obama?”

In no particular order, listed below are those who are arrayed against the designs of our “Dear Leader.”

Standing most prominently, is Vladimir Putin, the Russian bear. Putin has designs on the former Soviet satellite nations and he needs a strong economy and the leverage that an oil monopoly over the European market provides to fuel his aspirations.

His Ukraine adventure is proving more troublesome than originally thought, and Obama’s push to topple Assad in Syria threatens Putin’s access to a warm water port for Russia’s oil exports to Europe.

The Russian oligarchs are growing restive under the thumb of Putin, seeing his dreams of Sovietus revivivus as bad for business and potentially catastrophic. Putin’s leash is shortening, and his tenure is by no means a sure thing.

While Putin remains in power, he will oppose Obama’s Ottoman revival. He has no choice.

Next are the old guard and monarchies of the Middle East. We like to call them “dictators” even though in reality, while they are all Sunni Muslims, they are more concerned with maintaining their own wealth and power than in recreating an Islamic caliphate.

Among these were Gaddafi, Mubarak and the others deposed in the Arab Spring, but also numbered in this groups is the Hashemite kingdom of Jordan and both Saudi Arabia and the Emirates.

All are in danger of being ejected from this game. But just like Putin, they will not go bloodlessly.

Iran, a Shiite nation, is a natural enemy to any Sunni Islamic caliphate system. The Iranian rulers know from Islamic history (the same history we completely ignore here in the West) that any Sunni caliphate will soon swallow and erase the Shi’a, destroying all opponents to their well-established ideals of Islamic religious and political structure.

Iran, therefore, needs nuclear weapons to protect itself should it fail to derail Obama's ambitious plans. Should the Pan Arabic (Sunni) Islamic Union become a reality, the Iranian rulers believe that having the capability of ushering in Armageddon will keep the Sunni’s at bay.

At the very least, the Mullahs in Iran rest better knowing, should they fall, that they can take everyone else down with them. Think “mutually-assured destruction.” A sort of “MAD” amongst madmen.

Don’t let this apocalyptic scenario, however, lead you to think that Iran is going quietly into oblivion. On the contrary, it has tirelessly worked to thwart Obama's plans.

Iran’s use of terror and terror proxies is on the upswing. It will distract and misdirect, strike and cajole, but it will not permit a Sunni caliphate to appear on its border without a nuclear capability of its own to deter Sunni adventurism.

Obama’s setbacks in Syria and Benghazi have forced him to negotiate with the Iranians. He wants to assure them that they have nothing to fear from a caliphate, while simultaneously keeping the American people from recognizing the monumentally stupid policy objective he is pursuing.

To this end, he tells us he has gotten Iran to agree to postpone its nuclear work for ten years, under the ridiculously naive idea that the dynamics of the Middle East will have changed. Many believe Obama is in fact a Muslim. In reality, that really doesn’t matter.

Mark Christian writes:

Obama’s main agenda is to give the Islamists the land they once controlled but lost in 1924 and to help them establish their dream caliphate, or “Pan Islamic Arabic Union,” as it has been referred to by Islamist leaders recently.
Obama knows that the main opposing forces of his evil plan will not come from the American people, because the majority of Americans are suffering from confusion, ignorance, and political correctness. Americans are also divided over trivial things and suffer from an absolute lack of leadership....

Since Iran’s Muslims are made up of Shiite Muslims, they are a natural and historic enemy to any Sunni Islamic caliphate system, since they are very versed in the history of Islam. What the west chooses to ignore or even acknowledge is that any Sunni caliphate will swallow up the Shiite of Iran. Because of that threat, Iran needs nuclear weapons to protect themselves, if the caliphate comes to fruition, and Obama’s ambitious plans are realized.

In the event of the establishment of the Pan Islamic Sunni Arabic Union, or caliphate, Iran needs to have the ability to bring Armageddon before the caliphate then turns on them and having a nuclear weapon is a safety issue for Iran and a way to bring everyone down if necessary.

Do not get me wrong; Iran is not sitting quiet while all of that is taking place, but they have exerted tireless efforts to destroy Obama’s plans for an Islamic caliphate. Many strong and vicious efforts have been executed by the Iranians and on multiple fronts. But if Iran fails, and they are faced with a Sunni Islamic caliphate once again, Iran will be prepared to resist them with a nuclear weapon.

The negotiation with Iran started back in 2013, right after the Benghazi attack. It was a big hit that put a big stall in the Obama/Clinton Arab spring initiative, which is actually the Pan Islamic Arabic Union, or caliphate, in disguise.

Obama decided to negotiate with the Iranians after he got hit hard in Benghazi and Syria. Now, he wants to negotiate with the Iranians, asking that they delay their plans for a nuclear weapon for ten years. If after that time elapses and Iran feels the threat from the new caliphate is legitimate, then they will have the freedom to move forward with their nuclear plans.
But it was clear then, and still till today, that Iran is capable and will do whatever it takes to mess up Obama’s plans, so he decided to negotiate with them instead.

America found itself, once again, negotiating nuclear policy with a terrorist state. President Obama told us back in 2013 that we can all take a deep breath and that he was able to work a concession out of the Iranians and that they have issued a fatwa against nuclear weapons.

Most Americans aren’t aware that the foundation of Iran’s nuclear program was laid on March 5th, 1957 by the United States, under an Eisenhower program called “Atoms for Peace.” Iran established the Tehran Nuclear Research Center (TNRC) in 1967, which was a 5 megawatt nuclear research reactor, fueled by enriched uranium. In 1968, Iran signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and ratified it in 1970, making Iran’s nuclear program subject to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) verification and accountability.

Following the 1979 Revolution, a majority of the international nuclear cooperation with Iran was cut off. With little hope of continuing the program on their own, they thought it best to save face and attempt to “shame” America and its nuclear technology, by condemning nuclear weapons. It was for this reason and this reason alone that the fatwa was issued. It had nothing to do with any humanitarian interests held deeply in the hearts of Iranian leaders; they are certainly more than amenable to any method that allows them to eliminate their enemies more efficiently, especially Israel.

This nuclear fatwa, used as a “tool of convenience,” becomes all the more clear when we look forward five years, to 1984. While still under the reign of the same Ayatollah that issued the “nuclear fatwa” a brief five years before, we see the destruction of a seemingly “non-existent” Iranian nuclear program by Iraqi forces. Clearly, the Iranians had continued their nuclear program, though the fatwa was in place, knowing it would be a very handy tool to use against their neighbors.

The next time we see any reference to the 1979 “nuclear fatwa” was in 2003. The IAEA issued a report in 2003, condemning the Iranian nuclear program, accusing it of once again trying to weaponize the technology. Still, Iran didn’t budge. It wasn’t until the U.S. threatened to get involved militarily (the full might and power of the U.S. military was on display right next door in Iraq under the leadership of President Bush) that the Iranians finally caved in and conceded. What did this concession look like? Well, as you might have guessed, they simply “reaffirmed” the old stand-by fatwa from 1979, condemning nuclear weapons and “promising” to play nice.

So, for the record, we have clear evidence (TWICE) that the Iranians have no intention of adhering to their own fatwa that ostensibly stops them from seeking nuclear weapons. So, we have to wonder, is Iran trying to drag the 1979 fatwa out again in 2015, hoping we’ll bite on it one more time? As for me, I prefer peace, but peace based on lies is no peace at all.

President Obama is obviously willing to do whatever it takes to build his legacy on reestablishing the Islamic state again after it had been demolished in 1924, and he is willing to throw the United States and Israel under the bus to accomplish his goals. He will accomplish it by using the colonization of the Muslim countries as an excuse for the terrorism and shame the West by our ugly history?!!!

But European colonization didn’t create the terrorists; Islam and Mohammed birthed terrorism in order to spread a brutal and unforgiving ideology. Without European intervention, Muslims might be centuries further behind, way more than they are right now. Islam is a crippling force. Science wasn’t particularly important to them. European contact brought Muslim countries out of the Stone Age; the same Stone Age to which the Islamic jihad forces us all.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Front Page Magazine

Obama’s Surrender to Iran

At the expense of America and Israel.

March 11, 2015