Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HHS Claims States Cannot Cut Funds to Planned Parenthood
The New American ^ | 8/17/2015 | Raven Clabough

Posted on 08/19/2015 8:57:47 AM PDT by HomerBohn

According to the Obama administration, states do not have the right to decide how they spend taxpayer dollars. Federal health officials are warning that Louisiana and Alabama may be in violation of federal law after both states announced that they were ending state Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood. Despite this reaction from the federal government, other states have followed suit, with governors directing their state Department of Human Services to terminate Medicaid contracts with Planned Parenthood.

On August 3, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, who is seeking the GOP presidential nomination, announced that his administration would end provider agreements that reimbursed Planned Parenthood for health services through Medicaid.

In a statement regarding his decision, Jindal observed,

In recent weeks, it has been shocking to see reports of the alleged activities taking place at Planned Parenthood facilities across the country. Planned Parenthood does not represent the values of the people of Louisiana and shows a fundamental disrespect for human life. It has become clear that this is not an organization that is worthy of receiving public assistance from the state.

Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley made a similar announcement on August 6: "The deplorable practices at Planned Parenthood have been exposed to Americans. I’ve terminated any association with the organization in AL,” he asserted on Twitter, adding, “As a doctor and Alabama’s Governor, the issue of human life, from conception to birth and beyond, is extremely important to me. I respect human life, and do not want Alabama to be associated with an organization that does not.”

In a brief letter posted on LifeNews.com, Bentley gave 15 days' notice to Planned Parenthood regarding his decision to terminate the state’s agreement.

Both governors cited the release of undercover videos recorded by the Center for Medical Progress, where Planned Parenthood officials discuss the sale of body parts of aborted babies, as their reasoning behind their decisions. A total of six videos, which capture not only the trafficking of fetal body parts, but the illegal alteration of abortion procedures in an effort to preserve those parts, have been released by the Center for Medical Progress.

Critics noted that the videos revealed both barbarity and criminal behavior, if the organization was making profits on the organ sales.

Planned Parenthood has apologized for comments captured in the videos, but defensively asserts it has not broken any laws and that the videos were selectively edited and taken out of context.

Planned Parenthood executive vice president Dawn Laguens, in response to the outcry against the videos, claimed that the people captured in the video were in fact engaging in “standard medical practice to review tissue to ensure the health and safety of patients.”

Laguens insisted, “Planned Parenthood’s medical providers and staff are the best in the country,” adding, “We have the highest professional standards, and we take swift action if we are ever aware of an instance where those standards aren’t being met.”

Public reaction to the videos has compelled lawmakers in Washington to attempt to defund Planned Parenthood, so far with no success. Conservatives are now eyeing the upcoming Continuing Resolution as a means by which to defund the organization, which is the country's largest abortion provider.

States such as Louisiana and Alabama are launching their own battles to defund Planned Parenthood. But the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services contend that they are violating federal law that requires Medicaid beneficiaries to receive covered services from any qualified provider, Yahoo News reports.

Kevin Griffis, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, said Thursday that the federal Medicaid agency notified the states of the possible violation.

"Longstanding Medicaid laws prohibit states from restricting individuals who have coverage through Medicaid from receiving care from a qualified provider," Griffis said in a statement. "By restricting which provider a woman could choose to receive care from, women could lose access to critical preventive care, such as cancer screenings."

In fact, Yahoo News indicates that CMS would be able to withhold federal Medicaid funds from states that are considered out of compliance with federal law.

Planned Parenthood is currently considering a lawsuit in Louisiana, aware that it has the federal courts on its side after the courts overturned previous attempts in Arizona and Indiana to cut Medicaid reimbursements to the abortion giant.

Meanwhile, several other states have launched similar efforts against Planned Parenthood. On Friday, Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R) directed his state's Department of Human Services to terminate its Medicaid contract with Planned Parenthood within 30 days from the letter dated August, 14, Breitbart News reports.

A statement from Hutchinson on the matter explains,

It is apparent that after the recent revelations on the actions of Planned Parenthood, that this organization does not represent the values of the people of our state and Arkansas is better served by terminating any and all existing contracts with them. This includes their affiliated organization, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma.

Likewise, Utah Gov. Gary Herbert (R) has ordered his state’s agencies to end sending federal funds to Planned Parenthood, citing the revelations found within the investigative videos.

The Washington Times reports that the New Hampshire Executive Council voted 3-2 earlier this month against funding with Planned Parenthood of Northern New England. According to National Review, New Hampshire’s process is “unique” in that its elected council works with the governor to approve large state contracts.

Christopher Sununu, the son of former governor John Sununu, represented the tie-breaking vote. While he has previously voted for Planned Parenthood funding, he said that “investigations into potential criminal activity on both a federal and multi-state level have convinced me to withdraw that support.”

“This is not about pro-choice or pro-life. I am pro-choice,” Sununu said.

Of course, constitutionalists have long observed that the federal government has no authority in the U.S. Constitution to fund any Planned Parenthood’s activities, regardless of where one stands on the issue of abortion.

The firestorm generated by the release of the videos has even prompted StemExpress, the biomedical company that worked with Planned Parenthood to obtain the body parts of aborted babies, to announce it will no longer work with the abortion provider.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortionmill; babyparts4sale
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Stick to your guns! Where are the other states?

Central Communist Government and it's HHS should be tossed into the Potomac.

1 posted on 08/19/2015 8:57:47 AM PDT by HomerBohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

“..According to the Obama administration, states do not have the right to decide how they spend taxpayer dollars...”

Well, under a dictatorship, states rights disappear...Hitler would agree.


2 posted on 08/19/2015 8:59:54 AM PDT by EagleUSA (Liberalism removes the significance of everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I’m waiting for DHS to tell the Sanctuary Cities that they’re violating federal law....


3 posted on 08/19/2015 9:01:41 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Add concrete overshoes


4 posted on 08/19/2015 9:01:54 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Of course funds can be cut. Who do those folks think we are, public school grads?


5 posted on 08/19/2015 9:01:56 AM PDT by Da Coyote (Di)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

States can spend (or not spend) their money as they see fit, within the limits of the US and state Constitutions.


6 posted on 08/19/2015 9:02:29 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Just once. All it takes it one state. One state who would tell these douche bags in DC to take their queer marriages, their required planned parenthood funding, and other illegal and unconstitutional activities and shove them up their collective obamas.


7 posted on 08/19/2015 9:02:34 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I graduated forma great little college that refuses to accept one penny of money from teh government. Government money brings government control, after all.

By this principle, since the taxpayers (via our misrepresentatives) havae decided to fund education, would they argue that we don’t have the legal right to refuse their money?


8 posted on 08/19/2015 9:04:02 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Well, under a dictatorship, states rights disappear...

Yep. At this point, it would be more accurate to refer to the states as "provinces" instead.

9 posted on 08/19/2015 9:05:25 AM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I graduated from a great little college that refuses to accept one penny of money from the government. Government money brings government control, after all.

By this principle, since the taxpayers (via our misrepresentatives) have decided to fund education, would they argue that we don’t have the legal right to refuse their money?


10 posted on 08/19/2015 9:05:38 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
"According to the Obama administration,
states do not have the right to decide
how they spend taxpayer dollars...."


 photo 29oo1g2.jpg


Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


11 posted on 08/19/2015 9:10:11 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

HHS has NO SUCH AUTHORITY!!

The White House can’t restrict Federal funds without the House buying in.

(and we all know Boehner will stand firm......)


12 posted on 08/19/2015 9:13:27 AM PDT by G Larry (Obama is replicating the instruments of the fall of Rome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

“...that refuses to accept one penny of money from the government. Government money brings government control, after all....”

Yes, that is why the SMART banks told Obama what he could do with his “bail out” money. Many businesses have learned to NEVER touch government money.


13 posted on 08/19/2015 9:13:31 AM PDT by EagleUSA (Liberalism removes the significance of everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

the videos were selectively edited and taken out of context.

**********************************************************************

The “hands up, don’t shoot” lie, all over again.


14 posted on 08/19/2015 9:13:42 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (ThereÂ’s a race war already raging, I didnÂ’t start it but I have chosen sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

How long will the government tolerate that?


15 posted on 08/19/2015 9:15:22 AM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

What a joke. First, I doubt that states don’t have the right to defund PP. Second, even if they were breaking the law, they are just following in the footsteps of this Administration. Obama and his thugs have ignored the Constitution and have violated many laws - funding abortion through PP, not prosecuting cities for marijuana use, telling border patrol to ignore illegals, releasing illegal criminals, not prosecuting sanctuary cities — and the list goes on and on. What we are seeing with this idiot president and his thug administration is what you get with the rule of man, not the rule of law — totally arbitrary enforcement.


16 posted on 08/19/2015 9:16:32 AM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Supporting the butchering of babies.


17 posted on 08/19/2015 9:17:30 AM PDT by AIL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

I graduated forma great little college that refuses to accept one penny of money from teh government. Government money brings government control, after all.

********************************************************************

Our kids went to a Baptist church school, starting in kindergarten, then reminded annually, that if we ever accepted government aid in any form, that we would have to remove our children from that school.

That was late 70s, vouchers were being talked about even back then.

That school had the best, most dedicated and lowest paid, Christian teachers.


18 posted on 08/19/2015 9:21:14 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (ThereÂ’s a race war already raging, I didnÂ’t start it but I have chosen sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn
The US government support of the kind of disgusting slaughter is an absolute atrocity.

That they are using our tax dollars to do it is unforgivable. Vengeance is God's.

19 posted on 08/19/2015 9:32:38 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn
Since federal dollars are involved; couldn't a federal judge issue some sort of cease and desist order against PP?

That might bunch up their underalls and cause a little chaos.

20 posted on 08/19/2015 9:33:49 AM PDT by JEDI4S (I don't mean to cause trouble...it just happens naturally through the Force!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson