Posted on 08/19/2015 12:02:09 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Conservatives have been battling Obamacare for more than six years now, roughly the same amount of time it took American revolutionaries to get from Lexington and Concord to Yorktown. But as Thomas Paine wrote during that earlier struggle, Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.
Across these past six years, spanning from when Obamacare was first taking shape to today, many conservatives have kept their eye on the prize, while many center-right pundits and office-holders have grown impatient and lost interest in the fight. While almost all Republican voters remain steadfastly committed to repeal, it has become increasingly apparent that congressional Republican leaders, and their corporate backers, do not fully share that commitment. The same can be said of some in the presidential field.
At the same time, it has long been clear that the key missing ingredient in defeating Obamacare in stopping this effort on the part of the Left to trample on the ideals of the American Founding has been to have a winning conservative alternative that a prominent leader of the conservative movement is willing to step up and champion.
Scott Walker Battles Obamacare
Scott Walker has now done so. This morning, he became the first top-tier Republican presidential candidate to propose a concrete, viable alternative to Obamacares 2,400 pages of federal largess. No one did so in 2011 or 2012, and no one had yet done so in 2015. Now that has changed.
In fact, it would repeal every last word of President Obamas signature legislation.
Walkers alternative to Obamacare is well-conceived across the board. It would lower costs, secure liberty, and make it possible for anyone who wants health insurance to be able to get it. It would repeal Obamacares unprecedented individual mandate, its employer mandate, its coverage requirements, its abortion funding, its centralization and consolidation of power and money in Washington. In fact, it would repeal every last word of President Obamas signature legislation.
In its place, it would offer real reform. It would encourage people to shop for value and ask to see prices. It would promote the use of Health Savings Accounts and reduce the role of the insurer or government as middleman. It would preserve the employer-based market and revitalize an individual market that the federal government had broken even before the Democrats passed Obamacare and made everything so much worse. In so doing, it will help pave the way to full repeal.
Seventy years ago, the federal government began to undermine our health-care system through the tax code by favoring employer-based insurance over individually purchased insurance. If you make $35,000 and get insurance through your employer, you get a nice tax break (in that the value of your insurance isnt taxed as income). If you make $35,000 and your employer doesnt offer insurance, you get taxed on your income and then have to buy insurance with whats left, with no tax break whatsoever.
Obamacare didnt fix this longstanding inequality in the tax code. Take the typical single woman in her late-30s who makes $35,000. Under Obamacare, she gets no subsidy shes too middle class and too young. (Obamacare is for the near-poor and near-elderly.) Under Gov. Walkers alternative, shed get a $2,100 tax credit to help her buy the health insurance of her choice.
That tax credit would go directly to her, whereas if shed been eligible for an Obamacare subsidy, it would have gone directly to an insurance company. If she doesnt itemize her taxes (and likely even if she does), her tax credit would come entirely in the form of a tax cut. If she didnt use the whole $2,100 for insurance say, if she shopped for value and found catastrophic insurance for $1,500 she could put the her ($600) savings into an HSA that she would control.
The Simplicity Of Walkers Plan
Walkers tax credits would be simple, refundable, and aside from three simple age-bands flat. Thus, the IRS wouldnt have to verify anyones income, there would be no work-disincentives, no marriage penalty, and everyone could quickly compute what they or their family would be getting. Those under the age of 35 would get a $1,200 tax credit; those between 35 and 50 would get $2,100; those 50 and over would get $3,000; and parents would get $900 per child. So a typical family of four would get $6,000 ($2,100 per adult, $900 per child) to use to help buy health insurance of their choice, rather than being forced to buy government-approved insurance through a government-run exchange.
Americans have been thirsting for a well-conceived conservative alternative to Obamacare for six years. Finally a leading Republican has offered one.
In addition, Walkers alternative would offer a one-time, $1,000-per-person tax credit to anyone who opens, or already has, an HSA. (A family of four with an HSA would get $4,000.) This HSA tax credit would be available both to those who get insurance through their employer and to those who buy insurance on their own.
The amazing thing is that such an alternative, which would finally address a longstanding inequity in the tax code in a way that doesnt neglect the middle class, would save a fortune versus Obamacare. Moreover, it would provide a tax cut even versus the pre-Obamacare status quo. The nonpartisan Center for Health and Economy, co-chaired by liberal Princeton health economist Uwe Reinhardt and center-right former CBO director Douglas Holtz-Eakin, scored a very similar proposal (put out by the 2017 Project, which I run) and found it would save more than $1 trillion in federal spending over a decade versus Obamacare, while increasing access to doctors, lowering insurance premiums, and resulting in 6 million more people having private health insurance than under Obamacare.
At the same time, Walkers alternative wouldnt change the tax break for the typical persons employer-based insurance. It would merely close a tax loophole by capping the tax break on high-end plans that currently incentivizes people to get more and more employer-based insurance (because the more expensive their insurance, the greater their tax break, without limit). By closing this loophole while offering a long-overdue tax break in the individual market, Walker would more or less equalize the tax treatment of employer-based and individually purchased insurance without affecting the typical persons employer-based insurance except that those with employer-based insurance would subsequently have access to a new HSA tax credit and would be freed from Obamacare.
The Wisconsin governors alternative would also provide a few commonsense protections that would enable people with preexisting conditions to get insurance without undermining the very notion of insurance itself (which dates back to the Renaissance or beyond). Obamacare says you can wait until youre sick or injured to buy insurance at the same price as if youd been buying it all along, thereby driving up everyone elses costs. Walkers alternative would simply make it so that, if you already have employer-based insurance, you could move to the individual market without being charged more for a preexisting condition that was already covered. If you come of age and are buying insurance on your own for the first time, you couldnt be charged more because of a childhood condition that your parents insurance (or lack thereof) may or may not have covered. If you are having a baby, you wouldnt need to buy insurance before the baby is born but could buy it shortly after the birth without being charged more if he or she has a preexisting condition.
But aside from these policy details, the key thing is this: Americans have been thirsting for a well-conceived conservative alternative to Obamacare for six years. Finally a leading Republican has offered one. Obamas centerpiece legislation is now on a course toward repeal which would probably be the biggest loss ever for progressives and the biggest domestic-policy win in the history of the conservative movement.
That’s actually very good - the republicans in congress should have been pushing something like this since the last elections.
Seems like a solid plan to me. More walking the walk rather than talking the talk. Unfortunately talk seems to Trump action these days.
:)
tax credits are bs. the governments still controls the process. Deregulate it don’t patch it.
How is your healthcare in Panama?
What is your ideal?
Is is plausible?
taxes are BS.
Too many tax credits and much IRS involvement.
Doesn’t matter what he proposes. No one, well very few are listening. He should drop out already. But, then again, splitting up the vote among a lot of also rans helps Trump.
Agreed. All this leads to is a bunch of smoke and mirrors. By the time it might get through congress it would have so many exceptions and special interests that it would be no more viable than Obamacare.
Also see nothing here about buying across state lines.
D.
ALLOW ALL AMERICANS TO SHOP FOR INSURANCE IN ANY STATE
Health insurance is one of the only products individuals are not allowed to shop for across state lines. My plan would allow individuals to shop in any state to find health insurance that covers the services they need at a price that fits the family budget. Opening the health insurance market across state lines would allow companies to compete and require states to scrutinize the costs of their regulations. This will also provide incentives to increase transparency and lower costs for consumers.
https://www.scottwalker.com/obamacare-plan/files/Day-One-Patient-Freedom-Plan.pdf
This part I like, but Trump has already said this.
Where is Trump’s healthcare plan?
I don’t think he has laid it out yet. He’s been busy working on his immigration plan. He mentioned this in one of his speeches. This is one thing that needs to be implemented when obamacare is repealed - access to insurance across state lines. It will bring premiums down because of competition.
Buying insurance across state lines has been a “front and center” program must-have for years and years and years.
it is called ObamaCare. just change the name to trumpdoesnotcare
Trump will have something out as soon as he has figured out the successful plans in Canada and Scotland.
I heard about that!
=0
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.