Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama is Dangerous Not Just to Israel It is important to understand the motivation behind the Iran
inn ^ | 8/18/15 | Jay Shapiro

Posted on 08/18/2015 10:16:52 PM PDT by Nachum

Jay Shapiro claims that President Barack Obama is not an anti-Semite.

He thinks that the problem with him is that he is opposed to western Judeo-Christian civilization and he perceives Israel as an outpost of that civilization in the Middle East. That is why he is indifferent to the fate of Israel.

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dangerous; iran; israel; lebanon; obama; obamamuslim; rop; waronterror; worldwar3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Interesting theory.

Audio at link.

1 posted on 08/18/2015 10:16:53 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I think he is anti-Jew, anti-Christian AND anti-Judeo-Christian values. It all goes together.


2 posted on 08/18/2015 10:21:29 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; MarvinStinson
That is why he is indifferent to the fate of Israel.

For all we know Obama might be a member of the muslim brotherhood. Or beholden to them at the least.

3 posted on 08/18/2015 10:38:05 PM PDT by Mr Apple (Dinesh DÂ’Souza https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT9K2shh3qk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Dinesh D’Souza https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT9K2shh3qk


4 posted on 08/18/2015 10:38:25 PM PDT by Mr Apple (Dinesh DÂ’Souza https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT9K2shh3qk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Jay Shapiro claims that President Barack Obama is not an anti-Semite. He thinks that the problem with him is that he is opposed to western Judeo-Christian civilization and he perceives Israel as an outpost of that civilization in the Middle East. …
That is exactly the kind of viewpoint contained in propaganda that Iran puts out all the time. Claiming that it is not anti-Semitic is naïve at best.
5 posted on 08/18/2015 10:50:40 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

In other words, Obama is a psychopathic, sociopathic anti-white, anti-Jewish, anti-Christian Marxist with Islamic tendencies.

Gee, even Freud knew that!


6 posted on 08/18/2015 11:01:03 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Obama's simply out to appease his buddy in Moscow, KGB Putin. He's helping set the stage for a major Russia comeback. Iran is a pawn of Russia.

 photo Obama Iran Deal Russia KGB Putin 01_zpspjyus9ja.jpg

7 posted on 08/18/2015 11:03:02 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
That is exactly the kind of viewpoint contained in propaganda that Iran puts out all the time. Claiming that it is not anti-Semitic is naïve at best.

I don't know, I thought there was a grain of truth in it. Perhaps he is both an Jew-hater AND the anti-colonialist idealogue. A perfect storm.

8 posted on 08/18/2015 11:03:26 PM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
______________________________________________________________

"Joint war games are a logical outcome of the Sino-Russian Friendship and Cooperation Treaty signed in 2001, and reflect the shared worldview and growing economic ties between the two Eastern Hemisphere giants."

http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2005/09/war-games-russia-china-grow-alliance

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,170287,00.html
______________________________________________________________

Sept 11, 2014

China and Russia to build major seaport: report

China and Russia will build one of the largest ports in north-east Asia on Russia’s Sea of Japan coast, reports say, in a further sign of the powerhouses’ growing alliance.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-11/china-and-russia-to-build-major-seaport-report/5738036

9 posted on 08/18/2015 11:06:16 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Open Mic Catches Obama Asking Medvedev for Space on Missile Defense
March 26, 2012

"In a private conversation about the planned U.S.-led NATO missile defense system in Europe, President Barack Obama asked outgoing Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for space on the issue.

This is my last election,” Obama told Medvedev. “After my election I have more flexibility.”

“I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir,” Medvedev said, referring to incoming President Vladimir Putin."

http://fox8.com/2012/03/26/open-mic-catches-obama-asking-medvedev-for-space-on-missile-defense/
__________________________________________________

Obama was talking with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev when neither of them realized that their conversation was being picked up by microphones. Here is what they said:

Obama: “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space.”

Medvedev: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ...”

Obama: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”

Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”

“This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” That statement tells us much about the president’s mindset.

The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration. Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president’s comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.

In addition, there is the phrase “on all these issues,” implying more is at stake than just missile defense.”

Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn’t be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/


10 posted on 08/18/2015 11:06:32 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Obama To Betray Missile Defense Secrets To Moscow
Investor's Business Daily ^ | January 9, 2012 | IBD staff

Appeasement: From ObamaCare to recess appointments, honoring the Constitution has not been an administration hallmark. But when it comes to betraying secrets to mollify the Russians, it becomes a document the president hides behind.

It was bad enough that the 2012 defense authorization bill signed by President Obama set America on a downward spiral of military mediocrity.

He also issued a signing statement, something he once opposed, saying that language in the bill aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on the U.S. Standard Missile-3 — linchpin of our missile defense — might impinge on his constitutional foreign-policy authority.

Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they'd be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.

The president is required to certify that any technology shared will not be passed on to third parties such as China, North Korea or Iran, that the Russians will not use transferred secrets to develop countermeasures and that the Russians are reciprocating in sharing missile-defense technology.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


11 posted on 08/18/2015 11:07:04 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

From the campaign trail, 2008...

Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs

February 29, 2008 :: News
MissileThreat.com

A video has surfaced of Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama talking on his plans for strategic issues such as nuclear weapons and missile defense.

The full text from the video, as released, reads as follows:

Thanks so much for the Caucus4Priorities, for the great work you've been doing. As president, I will end misguided defense policies and stand with Caucus4Priorities in fighting special interests in Washington.

First, I'll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I'm the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning. And as president I will end it.[i.e. not win it]

Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.

I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.

I will not weaponize space.

I will slow our development of future combat systems.

And I will institute an independent "Defense Priorities Board" to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.

Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.

You know where I stand. I've fought for open, ethical and accountable government my entire public life. I don't switch positions or make promises that can't be kept. I don't posture on defense policy and I don't take money from federal lobbyists for powerful defense contractors. As president, my sole priority for defense spending will be protecting the American people. Thanks so much.

Article: Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs:

http://web.archive.org/web/20090412030633/http://missilethreat.com/archives/id.7086/detail.asp

"MissileThreat.com is a project of The Claremont Institute devoted to understanding and promoting the requirements for the strategic defense of the United States."
___________________________________________________


12 posted on 08/18/2015 11:07:43 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

He’s only “anti” one kind of colonialism, which is the only kind that generally benefited the world. The harmful kind of colonialism, such as practiced by Red China or any Caliphatist of any stripe, he’s all for that.


13 posted on 08/18/2015 11:18:30 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

He’s not ‘indifferent’ to the fate of Israel. He hates Israel and Israelis and wants them destroyed.

And the US and Americans, too, for that matter.


14 posted on 08/19/2015 12:41:31 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
He’s not ‘indifferent’ to the fate of Israel. He hates Israel and Israelis and wants them destroyed.

You are correct. Indifference would be a dramatic improvement compared with his current visceral hatred for Jews, Christians, Israel, the United States, freedom, and everything else decent in the world.

15 posted on 08/19/2015 1:32:00 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Very well put. I agree entirely.


16 posted on 08/19/2015 2:29:57 AM PDT by Piranha (Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have - Saul Alinsky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

He’s not an anti-Semite. He hates all white people, in other words. He’s Al Sharpton without the Ebonics and better cloths.


17 posted on 08/19/2015 3:23:51 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Men need a reason to shop. Women need a place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

18 posted on 08/19/2015 5:24:05 AM PDT by SJackson (C Matthews: should NY State recognize gay marriage? Sen Clinton: "No!" The crowd booed, 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The deal with Iran mandates that the United States give Iran missile technology so they will be able to hit the United States when they develop their atomic bombs. You would think that some of the politicians in Congress would loudly proclaim that to the American people.


19 posted on 08/19/2015 5:40:43 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple

Obama tried to make the muslim brotherhood a gift of Egypt.

When the Egyptian people booted out the muslim brotherhood Obama and company were very unhappy, as was John McCain who complained loudly.

Notice that whomever Obama and company backs immediately starts killing Christians.

Once they got in power in Egypt. the muslim brotherhood went after the Egyptian Christian Copts.

The Copts were much better off under Mubarak—and also now under Sisi.


20 posted on 08/19/2015 6:58:05 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson