Not a bad article...
However, I hate arguments of the "So-and-so had a right to blah-blah-blah," sort. Either the speaker is not very intelligent and actually believes a legal or moral right is in dispute, or the speaker wants to cut off discussion of whether the "right" was exercised in an appropriate or useful way.
For a change...
Yeah, not bad. Very surprisingly.
Ignoring her worthless sniveling commentary there are a lot of actual quotes from Trump.