But, Reverby added, Sanger’s main argument was not eugenics — it was that “Sanger thought people should have the children they wanted.”
[But, Reverby added, Sanger’s main argument was not eugenics — it was that “Sanger thought people should have the children they wanted.”
Sanger thought people should have.the children that *society* wanted. Blacks were not the only people’s on that list of the unwanted or lesser-wanted. ]
Pro-Regressive(s) otherwise known by the ironic name of “progressives”, think that they can make these decisions for society using government as a tool of coercion to subvert the will of the “individual” to make them behave like a bee in the hive... You know for society’s “good”....
Kings and Queens on the other hand used government as a tool of coercion to subvert the will of the individual to behave like a bee in the hive to do their bidding.
All “progressives” did was replace the “King and Queen” with the abstract concept of “For the good of society” while they hide behind their bureaus and committees. That way they can make all their decisions behind the scenes so there is no castle to burn down and rulers to behead when their bull sh!te gets too repressive for the masses. Instead they can easily slink away or join the crowds and blend in when any revolution comes.
All Progressive-ism is, is a cloaking device for Tyranny. Which is why I call it “Neo-Feudalism”