Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Black Agnes

I am glad I do not have to make the choice today. Shame on them for doing it that way. Still, if someone murders your child and your other child needs some vital organ transplant to save his life, they are a good transplant match, would you allow the transplant to take place? On the one hand, it is coming from a murdered child. On the other hand, you didn’t murder the child and it will save the other child’s life.

Another cell line needs to be developed for the sake of conscience. But using the existing one does not, in my opinion, make the user guilty of murder.


49 posted on 08/14/2015 12:11:25 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

The issue is the murder.

Abortionists murder without any legal penalties. And profit from it to boot.

There are plenty of ‘choices’ for cell lines. Have to wonder if ‘zealots’ aren’t the ones picking dead baby lines on purpose.

And then there’s this;

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/09/09/study-links-autism-to-vaccines-made-with-cells-from-aborted-babies/

You have no idea what kind of contaminants are in those live virus vaccines from aborted babies. Even the manufacturers don’t know exactly what’s in there. Since they’re ‘live virus’, they can’t be sterilized in any way and any ‘viruses’ in there are necessarily included with the ones being grown for vaccines.

This goes for any live virus vaccine.


51 posted on 08/14/2015 12:15:17 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson