Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Hillary above the Law?
National Review ^ | 8/12/2015 | Buck Sexton

Posted on 08/12/2015 7:28:43 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross

Hillary Clinton is in trouble. Or more accurately put, she should be in trouble — very big trouble, in fact. The latest from the Department of Justice is that, yes, they have seized Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server and an accompanying thumb drive. The FBI has reportedly confiscated copies of the same e-mails from Hillary’s lawyer because it deemed the information contained in them too sensitive for him to keep.

While attempting to defend the indefensible, a Clinton spokesman said that this merely shows that the former secretary of state is cooperating with a “security inquiry.” That pathetic spin was meant to prevent the American people from recognizing there is not just smoke but fire to the Hillary e-mail scandal.

Too late. Already, the flames are visible. The most damning revelation about Hillary’s e-mails from the last 24 hours is not the details of the investigation into her homebrew server. What’s making headlines across the political spectrum is that some of the material she sent via her personal server was so sensitive that it was designated “Top Secret.”

This is a jaw-slaps-the-table moment. Even for those of us who hold a very low opinion of Mrs. Clinton’s character, integrity, and judgment, this is a graver offense than many had contemplated. Merely the storage of “Top Secret” e-mails – never mind their dissemination over open channels to some individuals likely not cleared to read them — is a federal felony. On top of that, it is unthinkable that Hillary could have sent such sensitive information and not known at the time that it was sensitive.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clintoncrimefamily; criminal; hillary; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryemails; hillaryemailserver; prosecute
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
I'll believe it when I see it, but I'm skeptical. It's in the hands of DOI"j". McConnell/Boehner control the agenda of Congress.

Why will a Clinton scandal be any different this time? Unless 0bama/Jarrett are behind it. Hmmm. Pass the popcorn.

1 posted on 08/12/2015 7:28:43 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Yes


2 posted on 08/12/2015 7:30:12 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Yes - unless, it pleases Lord Obama that she not be.


3 posted on 08/12/2015 7:32:29 AM PDT by OldNukeDaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

This is a right wing conspiracy against women in pants suits.


4 posted on 08/12/2015 7:32:39 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Judge Napolitano: Hillary Clinton May Have Violated Same Law Petraeus Was Prosecuted For.
5 posted on 08/12/2015 7:32:41 AM PDT by McGruff (Trump/Cruz 2016 - My Dream Team)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
IS SHE THAT STUPID? Hillary doesn't even know the calendar and travel schedule of the Secy of State is considered classified information?

All of this is of paramount importance b/c it impinges on
US ntl security....... and the safety and security of Americans.

Now under FBI scrutiny, Colorado's Platte River Networks handled the Clintons' email accounts. It’s been confirmed by (1) the US inte community, and, (2) the office of the State Dept IG, that classified information was transmitted through Hillary’s private email account...and that Hillary deleted 1000's of emails prior to turning some over to the State Dept for record-keeping (as US law requires).

(A) It is possible that Platte River Networks may have copies of Hillary's deleted emails.....but presumably the outfit does not have ntl security clearance. (B) Hillary's lawyer is said to be in possession of a thumb drive of her govt emails.....but Kendall does not have national security clearance.

AMERICANS NEED TO KNOW ASAP who was allowed to see the data in Platte River Network and Kendall's possession?

=============================================

POINTS TO PONDER: a cabinet-level government employee using their own server and personal e-mail exclusively is unheard of. It is considered a crime for ex-govt employees to have ntl security emails. All ntl security material belongs to the American people and is to be turned over upon termination of employment.

================================================

Criminal implications of Hillary's emails.

<><> a high government official (particularly the Secy of State) to utilize day to day a non-government computer for communications in the performance of their job is in violation of security laws in dozens of ways.

<><> whether marked as such, all emails emanating from Hillary's private server are classified ntl security data.

<><> the US govt tech system is really fussy----particularly about emails from the US State Dept.

<><> a govt official (particularly the Secy of State) cannot simply buy a brand new computer with licenses and programs and expect to have it certified.

<><> US govt officials are required to have a government-purchased computer, set up by the govt, utilizing a CACC card cleared technician.

6 posted on 08/12/2015 7:33:11 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Anything that was marked as Top Secret, or in any way classified info is now known all across the intel world. Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, all have copies by now, and probably have had since 2009.......................


7 posted on 08/12/2015 7:33:27 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Yes, she is above the law. It’s a bitter, unfortunate truth in this country, but the Clintons are immune to laws that apply to the common folk.


8 posted on 08/12/2015 7:35:34 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Liberalism is the poison ivy that infests the garden of society.r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

She is that stupid I am coming to believe. You can bet they will find some that show she and Willard sold her influence as SOS.

“Never write when you can talk. Never talk when you can nod. And never put anything in an e-mail.” Elliot Spitzer


9 posted on 08/12/2015 7:37:38 AM PDT by quantumman (werea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Why will a Clinton scandal be any different this time? Unless 0bama/Jarrett
are behind it......unless they want to destroy her......or extort her.

Criminal govt inquiries into Hillary's secret emails tell a huge story. The days of Obama protecting the Clintons seem to be over. How come? In his book, "The Rich and Super Rich," Ferdinand Lundberg observes that when L/E goes after criminals, it signals that the protection payoff wasn't big enough to keep the law at bay.

Looks like Obama's been reading the sordid Clinton Chronicles WRT the billions they're pulling in. Obama apparently feels he got shortchanged.

=================================================

ACADEMY-AWARD WORTHY Obama's got a dam good act.
He "knows nothing." Obama didn't even know about this (snix).

Circa 2010--Ex-Pres Clinton in Moscow having a laugh w/ Putin.
as strategic US uranium deposits were sold off to Russia for Big Bucks.

With all the top-level intel available to him, can Americans actually believe:

<><>Obama was oblivious to the Clintons jerking around US foreign policy?

<><> Obama knew nothing of Hillary and Sid Blumenthal's emails WRT Iran (the man Obama banned from US govt employment)?

<><> Obama knew nothing about the Clinton Foundation/slush fund buck-raking activities?

<><> Obama never noticed Bill Clinton trotting around the globe?

<><> Obama never noticed the Clinton "charity" used to worm his way into the confidences of foreign leaders.... but only those leaders w/ untapped reserves of gold, uranium, oil, and other valuable commodities?

<><> Obama never knew Hillary's brother got a gold-mining permit in Haiti?

================================================

As an incentive to drop out of the 2008 primary, Hillary got State. She ran it like a shadow govt.... w/ Billsy hovering over the server, taking notes WRT buck-raking opportunities available from Secy Hillary's actions OR inaction.

Secy Hillary never e-v-e-r uttered a discouraging word e-v-e-r......as the Clinton Foundation sucked up hundred of millions of foreign dollars from shady characters.

The avaricious Clintons devised hundreds of obscure programs to collect billions.....bragging about do-goodism, how the money was supposedly dispersed to "assist" endless charitable projects.

The Clintons deposit Obama's cut into his two "foundations" (two that we know of).

============================================

THIS JUST IN State Dept people implicated in this have lawyered-up w/ pricey bigtime criminal lawyers....not ambulance chasers. Looks like a lot of State Dept types are expecting to be charged with a crime.

10 posted on 08/12/2015 7:38:18 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
What’s making headlines across the political spectrum is that some of the material she sent via her personal server was so sensitive that it was designated “Top Secret.”

And...SHE GAVE TOP SECRET EMAILS TO A PERSONAL LAWYER WHO STORED THEM IN HIS DESK DRAWER!
11 posted on 08/12/2015 7:38:57 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quantumman

Well you knew Hillary wasn’t the best or brightest when she had some trouble passing the bar exam.


12 posted on 08/12/2015 7:39:07 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Liz

“US uranium deposits were sold off to Russia for Big Bucks”

That right there should sink any hope Hillary had of running for president, again.


13 posted on 08/12/2015 7:42:40 AM PDT by McGruff (Trump/Cruz 2016 - My Dream Team)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

If the traitorous GOPe-controlled Congress won’t even mention the need to impeach the Traitorobama regime, don’t expect them to even notice when Hillary uses one of her Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free cards to skate past her email crimes.


14 posted on 08/12/2015 7:42:45 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Sometimes the law defends plunder and participates in it. Thus the beneficiaries are spared the shame, danger, and scruple which their acts would otherwise involve. Sometimes the law places the whole apparatus of judges, police, prisons, and gendarmes at the service of the plunderers, and treats the victim — when he defends himself — as a criminal. In short, there is a legal plunder…

You would use the law to oppose socialism? But it is upon the law that socialism itself relies. Socialists desire to practice legal plunder, not illegal plunder. Socialists, like all other monopolists, desire to make the law their own weapon. And when once the law is on the side of socialism, how can it be used against socialism? For when plunder is abetted by the law, it does not fear your courts, your gendarmes, and your prisons. Rather, it may call upon them for help.

/”The Law” - Bastiat

HOORAY Buck Sexton.


15 posted on 08/12/2015 7:43:19 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Is this biatch the leader you want surviving a nuclear blast? This and her family will be what’s left of America?


16 posted on 08/12/2015 7:43:54 AM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

According to Judge Andrew Napolitano she’s in 20 years worth of trouble. This will ultimately be plea bargained down to an almost sincere ,”I’m sorry”.


17 posted on 08/12/2015 7:44:14 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

My prediction? Yes.


18 posted on 08/12/2015 7:48:09 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

So far, yes.


19 posted on 08/12/2015 7:49:50 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Obama has never been Hillarie’s friend the only reason he had her in government was so that he could watch her and have his spies in the state department keep an eye on her. my guess is that he is going to try and take her out of political contention. we should be looking at Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders as the democratic opposition in the next election.


20 posted on 08/12/2015 7:50:06 AM PDT by PCPOET7 (VORS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson