If Thomas Perez (0bama) wants this it has to be bad for Americans.
1 posted on
08/11/2015 6:24:23 PM PDT by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
Thomas Perez is living poison.
To: jazusamo
Why is this under Labor and not Banking?
3 posted on
08/11/2015 6:30:09 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(This tagline lists all of Hilary's accomplishments............................)
To: jazusamo
I’m a bit thick, help me out here. And I did read the article...
Are they setting up a legal exposure for financial advisors, perhaps if people loose money in the market?
But it’s under Labor?
7 posted on
08/11/2015 6:42:17 PM PDT by
DanielRedfoot
(Creepy Ass Cracker)
To: jazusamo
It’s so nice now that we don’t have to use that messy old Congress system to pass laws.
Now ‘rules’ are dictated and we are supposed to obey them.
S/ dripping.
8 posted on
08/11/2015 6:43:36 PM PDT by
alpo
Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!
11 posted on
08/11/2015 6:52:25 PM PDT by
jazusamo
(0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
To: jazusamo
I don't know the details, but is this a back door attempt to get financial advisors to report on their customers' holdings, under the guise of protecting the consumer from churning charges?
-PJ
12 posted on
08/11/2015 6:56:49 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: jazusamo
It’s too bad we don’t have a constitution that limits this kind of dictatorial (nee kingly), non-legislative rule-making.
18 posted on
08/12/2015 5:50:20 AM PDT by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
