Nice attempt at a snowjob. Polish the fecal bolus (Look that up in your Funk & Wagnalls) that Faux News blew out Thursday night and see if you can sell it as a great event and a new model to be followed in the future.
Sorry. You can even link it to the Horowitz name and I still ain’t buying. And if Mr. Horowitz actually concurs with your appraisal of Thursday night’s charade, all I can say is, I beg to differ. Everybody occasionally burns their toast. Sorry about your toast, Mr. Horowitz.
Thursday night’s disappointment can best be described as 2 hours of snide, triumphalist gotcha “questions” couched as an accusative condemnation, rather than a query, for a few of the candidates. Virtual ignoring of one or more others - how ya’ feeling Ted Cruz, my man? And brown-nosing, flattering statements masquerading as questions for a few “preferred” candidates. I’m sure YOU feel the love, dontcha, Jebby?
And as for “even progressive liberals learning something from it”....My view is that they learned, or they HAD WHAT THEY ALREADY KNEW REINFORCED....That if you have the host network, Faux News, and the “moderators”, Baier, Wallace and Kelly prostituted to the plan to sandbag some candidates and provide tee ball rests for certain others, the sham debate should go just the way you want it to go.
Too bad Mr. Trump didn’t roll over and play dead for the faux mods. And how gauche and ungentlemanly of Mr. Trump to instantly perceive that the fix was in, to eat the mods’ lunches and bitch slap them with their empty lunch sacks.
Worse luck next time!
Looks like there’s a lot of “burning toast” these days.
Maybe you are mistaken and it’s not burnt toast but Trump roast.
That was an excellent post. As to progressive liberals learning from the so-called ‘debate,’ they’ve already been quite clear about what they learned:
That the ‘war on women’ is real, and that the GOP is guilty.
Thanks, Megyn.