Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RIghtwardHo

“But nullification? That they can never stop.”

Actually the state has stopped nullification which is why you only saw it so few times in your career. They stopped it via the jury selection process. No one is judged by a jury of their peers anymore, but rather they get a least common denominator jury.


5 posted on 08/07/2015 9:39:45 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

I get your point. I just don’t agree. The problem is:

1. Juries don’t know about it and

2. WAY to many jurors are overwhelmed by the process and have the “if you didn’t do it, you wouldn’t be here” attitude.


6 posted on 08/07/2015 9:41:30 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: JLS

You are correct. If a prospective juror, during voir dire, shows that he knows about jury nullification and fails to agree to follow the judge’s instructions unquestioningly, he will be excused at once. If a juror, once seated, then attempts nullification, he will be liable to a charge of perjury, for having agreed under oath to obey the judge and then not doing so.

The first case has happened to me.


17 posted on 08/08/2015 5:55:39 AM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson