Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge wants Clinton certification on emails
Politico ^ | August 1, 2015 | JOSH GERSTEIN

Posted on 08/01/2015 11:25:40 AM PDT by Hojczyk

A federal judge has ordered the State Department to ask Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to certify under penalty of perjury that she has turned over some of the work-related emails she kept on a private server during the four years she served as secretary of state.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued the order Friday in connection with a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit the conservative group Judicial Watch filed in 2013 seeking records about the employment status of Clinton aide Huma Abedin, who worked as Clinton's deputy chief of staff but later transferred to a part-time job as a so-called "special government employee."

The State Department told Judicial Watch last year that all records about the arrangement had been disclosed, but after Clinton's use of a private email account for official business was revealed earlier this year, Judicial Watch moved to reopen the lawsuit. Abedin was also revealed to have used an account on the same server.

Judicial Watch hailed the decision, saying it would put teeth into requests for Clinton's emails and force her to account for all her government records. However, a close reading of Sullivan's order indicates that it only covers emails "responsive" to the group's request about Abedin's employment.

"This blockbuster ruling is the most significant legal development to date in the ongoing Clinton email scandal. Hillary Clinton will now have to answer, under penalty of perjury, to a federal court about the separate email server she and her aides used to avoid accountability to the American people,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. “This court action shows that the rule of law and public’s right to know will no longer take a back seat to politics. Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration that is covering for her are not above the law.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillaryemails; jw; soshillary

1 posted on 08/01/2015 11:25:40 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“some” of the emails??


2 posted on 08/01/2015 11:26:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“Under penalty of perjury.” Right.


3 posted on 08/01/2015 11:27:21 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Hillary: “Perjury? No problem, I do it all the time.”


4 posted on 08/01/2015 11:28:02 AM PDT by beethovenfan (Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

So what? What is a little perjury to the Clintons?


5 posted on 08/01/2015 11:28:30 AM PDT by Savage Beast ("You can, in fact must, shout 'Fire!' in a crowded theater. It just has to be the truth." J.Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“At least one”.


6 posted on 08/01/2015 11:30:32 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I would not think the word “some” would ever appear in a legal document.


7 posted on 08/01/2015 11:33:13 AM PDT by dmet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I don’t remember.
I am not sure.
I don’t remember.
I aM not sure.


8 posted on 08/01/2015 11:40:41 AM PDT by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Or what? A threat without real consequences is empty lip-service.


9 posted on 08/01/2015 12:00:40 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

Her mind’s in a blender, it’s jello! The concussed one could not tell the truth if her life depended on it.


10 posted on 08/01/2015 12:46:57 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Exactly. Just another smoke screen. “Some” renders the Order and Certification as vague and thus there is no way to determine either outcome. The Order can not be enforced and any Certification she signs will not offer any help. Parsing words is Clinton signature event. Now they wrote this for the Judge.


11 posted on 08/01/2015 12:47:36 PM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
I would like to see her JUST ONCE held accountable for just ONE of her crimes...

So do you know what happened to those emails Ms. Clinton?




12 posted on 08/01/2015 1:37:56 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

This could be a fatal problem for Hillary. If there are emails that fall into the order that She has already deleted and they turn up from another source the judge would through the book at her.


13 posted on 08/01/2015 1:51:09 PM PDT by glabbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson