Posted on 07/31/2015 6:05:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
On paper, Cruz 2016 is raking in cashbut the ultra-wealthy donors in charge of spending the cash dont seem that interested in actually helping their candidate.
Ted Cruzs coterie of supportive super PACs are crawling with cashbut its not doing him much good at the moment.
The Republican presidential contender, a first-term senator from Texas, has an unusual network of super PACs in place to boost his White House prospects. Instead of giving his imprimatur to one main super PAC, which is the norm, Cruz has four officially sanctioned super PACs: Keep the Promise PAC, Keep the Promise I, Keep the Promise II, and Keep the Promise III. National Review reported that this set-up is designed to give individual billionaires and their families maximal control over how their cash gets spent.
And theres the rub. FEC filings show that those four PACs, combined, have taken in a healthy $39 millionbut only spent a teeny tiny little fraction of that on the senators presidential efforts. And one of the PACs actually donated to one of Cruzs 2016 rivals.
This news comes as Cruz faces lackluster poll numbers and less than a week before the first GOP debate. RealClearPolitics average gives him just 5.2 percent of the vote, lagging behind fellow conservative firebrands Rand Paul and Ben Carson. And a recent Fox News poll showed his support among likely Republican primary voters got cut in half since mid-Marchfrom 10 percent to just 4 percent.
And while Cruzs PACs have kept their powder dry, other 2016 contenders backers are spending big. The Conservative Solutions Project spent seven figures on TV ads touting Sen. Marco Rubios record on Iran, per the Tampa Bay Times. And, according to the Cincinnati Enquirer, the John Kasich-backing New Day for America has already spent $1.7 million blanketing New Hampshire televisions with ads touting the Ohio governors record.
Candidates who arent running for president are getting similar boosts; Pat Toomey, a vulnerable Republican senator in Pennsylvania, is benefitting from a $1.5 million TV, direct mail, and digital video ad campaign from Concerned Veterans for America.
But Ted Cruz doesnt seem to be getting that kind of love. And in his home state, its raised a few eyebrows.
Are these people really planning to spend this money? queried one Texas Republican insider, adding that he thought the super PACs gun-shy approach to spending was bizarre.
So while Cruz has made a host of positive headlines for the cash that his supporting super PACs have raked in, he doesnt actually seem to have benefitted much from their largesse.
First off, theres Keep the Promise I, a PAC that gets the bulk of its cash from billionaire investor Robert Mercer. In this quarter of the year, the PAC took in more than $11 million and spent only $536,169.90. The kicker? Of that $536,169.90, a sweet five hundred grand went to a super PAC backing Carly Fiorinawho, of course, is also running for president. Against Cruz.
CNN, which first reported on Carlys PACs money, called the contribution unusual, which is certainly a nice way to put it. Of the remaining $36,000 that the PAC spent, $20,000 went to a D.C.-based polling company. The remaining $16,169.90 went to Bracewell and Giuliani LLP for legal consulting. So from April through July of this year, the biggest benefactor of a putatively pro-Cruz super PAC was Carly Fiorina.
Its Cruzs own super PAC hedging against him before the first debate, said the Republican insider.
Then theres Keep the Promise IIfunded solely by a $10 million donation from Toby Neugebauer, son of Rep. Randy Neugebauerand Keep the Promise III, funded by the fracking-enriched Wilks family. Those two PACs, combined, raised $25 million this quarter. Keep the Promise II didnt spend anything, and Keep the Promise III spent just $5,025.
Finally, theres the Keep the Promise PAC, which doesnt appear to be dominated by one major donor or donor family. It brought in a comparatively modest $1.8 million this quarter and spent about $97,000. Most of that went to covering legal fees, software, and media production. The PAC also spent $1,698.39 at an Austin Apple Store on a computer. This all means that while this PAC looks like its been busier than the other three, its still not doing a whole lot.
Cruzs atypical super PAC situation was designed to give donors more control over how their money got spent. But no one anticipated that these donors would be so stingyexcept when it comes to boosting a Cruz competitor.
Well, at least we know Ted is a fiscal conservative as well as a social conservative.
Exactly. Let all the one half percenters spend their money now when the primary season is 6 months away. Following the path set by Rove the ignorant Bastard. 60 million wasted for nothing.
Cruz will be flush with cash when he needs it.
Its Cruzs own super PAC hedging against him before the first debate, said the Republican insider.
************
What insider? And doubt if the PAC was hedging, Carly would be the hedge.
Gee - instead of throwing cash away as if it were government handouts, he is planning on the most effective/efficient use of it - how dastardly!
I’m not sure this piece is that far off....
Well, at least we know Ted is a fiscal conservative as well as a social conservative.
Good for Sen Cruz....keeping the powder dry.
And, helping Carly....just a bit. Nothing wrong with that :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.