Sounds to me like the article is slamming 100% disabled combat vets with PTSD. Good look taking their guns.
From many of the Vets I talked to seems PTSD has turned into an easy route to freeload for ‘some’ claimants. Maybe its over-diagnosed.
On another thought, I am not real sure its a real good idea that someone really bummed out with PTSD to be carrying.
Some might counter that the 2nd Amendment should be all-inclusive. In that case those that act crazy with guns will have to be sifted out by responsible carriers, just like in the “Old West”.
How loud would the screaming be if they disallowed anyone on public assistance?