Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police accused in Freddie Gray's death say they gave statements under duress
The Baltimore Sun ^ | 07/18/2015 | Kevin Rector

Posted on 07/18/2015 2:02:26 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Three of six Baltimore police officers charged in the death of Freddie Gray argued in court filings this week that they provided statements to police investigators under duress because they feared losing their jobs.

Two of the officers said that when investigators asked them to provide statements about the circumstances surrounding Gray's arrest, they were led to believe they were doing so as witnesses — not as suspects.

(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: baltimore; blackkk; duress; elijahcummings; freakstate; freddiegray; kevinrector; marilynmosby; maryland

1 posted on 07/18/2015 2:02:26 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Two of the officers said that when investigators asked them to provide statements about the circumstances surrounding Gray's arrest, they were led to believe they were doing so as witnesses — not as suspects.

Cops can lie to you. As cops, they should have known that.

2 posted on 07/18/2015 2:06:56 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hmmmm....so the cops played cop tricks on cops.
Never talk to the cops, even if you're a cop.
3 posted on 07/18/2015 2:08:31 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

Were they read their Miranda rights?


4 posted on 07/18/2015 2:14:04 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
They should have watched this video.

Don't Talk To Police

5 posted on 07/18/2015 2:15:56 PM PDT by TaxPayer2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I guess they thought that since they were cops,it'd be ok to talk to cops.

NEVER TALK TO COPS

6 posted on 07/18/2015 2:20:49 PM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

They should have known that, but then again, who in their right mind would have thought they would all be charged with manslaughter or worse?

It was a crazy time in that city. I can certainly see why they would have been under duress. Still, facts should not be different. At the same time, they have the same rights as the rest of us. It should not have been a set up.


7 posted on 07/18/2015 2:25:48 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

But they are cops so they now how it works. Every statement is given under duress by this logic.


8 posted on 07/18/2015 2:28:14 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

If they weren’t “in custody”, it doesn’t matter. Has to be a custodial interrogation.

Having said that, I didn’t read enough to know if it was.


9 posted on 07/18/2015 2:33:57 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The FOP Attorney should have given them “Garrity” boilerplate as a preface to their statement.


10 posted on 07/18/2015 3:22:17 PM PDT by lightman (O Lord, save Thy people and bless Thine inheritance, giving to Thy Church vict'ry o'er Her enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

That probably can be cured at the Motion to Suppress. Walk them through their training, and the procedures that they follow themselves with suspects.

The purpose of Miranda is to inform someone of their rights. If they know their rights, it might be a ‘no harm, no foul’ event.


11 posted on 07/18/2015 4:22:27 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I thought they didn’t even talk to investigators without a Union representative (at least) present?


12 posted on 07/18/2015 4:51:10 PM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; Tolerance Sucks Rocks

B’more ping hon.


13 posted on 07/18/2015 4:51:44 PM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; Bigg Red; ...

Maryland “Freak State” PING!


14 posted on 07/19/2015 4:18:45 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Cancer-free since 1988! US out of UN! UN out of US!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson