"THERE COULD COME A POINT WHERE DEMOCRATS CANNOT AFFORD TO LOSE ANY MORE WHITE VOTERS"

Frontpage Mag ^ | 07/18/2015 | Daniel Greenfield

[Zuse]

Bernie Sanders is very white from a very white state.

[RIghtwardHo]

Well this is wishful thinking by someone.

The GOP Latino vote is gone. period. And there are PLENTY of white Libtards around.

We are a polarized electorate. BIG time. There isn’t going to be any shift of significance.

But hey, happy talk before each General Election has worked out SO well for us since 2008 hasn’t it?

[philetus]

And yet the white dems seem to think they will still be in power and ruling it all.

[Sivad]

Once they (the Rats) figure out that they
don’t need white voters then how much longer
after will it take them to figure out that
they no longer need white political candidates?

[Will88]

A problem with this theory is the several liberal states where whites are a very high percentage (80% to 95%) of the population: the New England states, Minnesota, Washington, Oregon and Wisconsin to a lesser extent.

Those states, and maybe a few others, are where the left still gets a high percentage of the white vote and still carries the states easily in presidential and most statewide elections.

If those white folks who live with few of the problems of the multicultural society opened their eyes to what is happening, then national elections could be swung much more towards more conservative candidates.

[henkster]

The floodgates were creaking in 2000 and 2004; the democrat/communist media propaganda complex threw everything it had into the fight and almost kept the White House in 2000, and made a very good run in 2004. Both times the democrat/communist party ran totally unqualified bozos who would have made disastrous Presidents. And they barely lost.

In 2008, the floodgates burst. Again, they ran a totally unqualified bozo who made for a disastrous President. But he was black, so it was racist to oppose him. And in 2008, the GOP ran a lifeless bozo of their own.

We are a polarized electorate, and the democrat/communist party owns all of the “aggrieved minorities” as well as enough dependent and “true believer” liberal whites.

[TBP]

But they will keep doing so. That’s why they need fraudulent illegal votes.

[Thud]

Nah, it doesn’t matter who they vote for, or if they vote at all, or if they even exist. What counts is what a judge says after a lawsuit about any given election.

[BobL]

See my ‘about’ page. Whites are already voting 75-89% Republican in the South, and Hispanics are nearly splitting their vote down the middle here (unlike blacks, there is a limit to how much crap the Hispanics will tolerate from Democrats).

You (and I) are TOTALLY RIGHT. Democrats know it and have known it for at least a decade. Most likely the media knows it too. I don’t know if Republican ‘leaders’ understand it - but they certainly act as if they don’t.

[clearcarbon]

"THERE COULD COME A POINT WHERE DEMOCRATS CANNOT AFFORD TO LOSE ANY MORE WHITE VOTERS"

What happens if that large block of undocumented immigrants becomes self aware in 2016 and decides to run it's own legitimate candidates for the presidency and State governorships?