Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

B-29’S STRIKE FIRST BLOWS AT 4 MORE JAPANESE CITIES; BIG 3 MEETING DUE MONDAY (7/13/45)
Microfilm-New York Times archives, Monterey Public Library | 7/13/45 | W.H. Lawrence, Lindesay Parrott, Raymond Daniell, Sydney Gruson, Hanson W. Baldwin

Posted on 07/13/2015 4:50:04 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: colorado tanker

If he has a conference with any of his economic advisors, he’s going to get a huge shock tomorrow.

As for the “reluctant war Emperor,” it appears to have been one of those myths created by a defeated Axis power, along with the “Honorable Wehrmacht, it was Hitler’s fault” myth. It has become more apparent with the passage of time that “Hirohito as figurehead” was a myth concocted by the Japanese military leadership to shield the Emperor from any war crimes guilt. In effect, they agreed to take all the blame for starting the war. Hara Kiri, if you will. Hirohito was astute enough to play his part in the myth. As World War 2 morphed into the Cold War, it became convenient for the United States to play along with the myth as we needed Japan as a bulwark against Asian communism. Just as we went along with the “honorable Wehrmacht” myth, as the beneficiaries of that myth became the leaders of the Bundeswehr, whom we needed as a bulwark against European Soviet communism.

More modern historical analysis would consider Hirohito an active participant, certainly to the extent of having full knowledge through military briefings, of all of Japan’s expansionist and militarist plans. And he went along willingly with all of them. Was he as culpable as Hitler? I think not, and not by a long shot. But was he a completely innocent figurehead? No, and not by a long shot.

The Japanese militarist leadership certainly bears most of the blame for the continued needless suffering of the Japanese people at this point in the war. But I will give them credit for taking the fall for their Emperor and not throwing him under the bus like Hitler’s cronies did to him. Maybe that’s a Japanese cultural thing. But by preserving the institution of the Emperor, and protecting his legacy, they gave Japan something to hold on to as the Japanese people struggled to rebuild the country the military ruined.

I guess there was a shred of honor among such men.


21 posted on 07/13/2015 3:29:26 PM PDT by henkster (Where'd my tagline go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: henkster
Given Japan's culture, not even the militarists could shame the Emperor by laying the blame on him. And doing so might have led to us demanding unconditional surrender and dismantling the monarchy.

Leaving the Emperor on the throne saved just enough face to allow Hirohito to order his people to surrender.

22 posted on 07/13/2015 4:43:16 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson