Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: don-o
I thought this video was in possession of the government? At least when the Don Carlos lawyers filed for relief from the Broden subpoena, that's what they said.

Regardless of the facts in the case, if Broden got the video through the court and then posted it to YouTube in violation of the gag order, things could get interesting in court.

There wasn't a whole lot on the video. Doesn't really show much other than some guys in cuts running to a vehicle, somebody down behind the car on the left, and some police moving around. Can't even tell if they were shooting.

2 posted on 07/11/2015 4:27:53 AM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: USNBandit

The Twin Peaks video was the one in question and on which the gag order was applied.

I have lost track for a couple days (tree fell on my house) but, last I knew, there the Don Carlos lawyers had applied to quash a subpoena for their video.

Perhaps others can fill in my gaps.


3 posted on 07/11/2015 4:32:15 AM PDT by don-o (I am Kenneth Carlisle - Waco 5/17/15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: USNBandit
I haven't found the Don Carlos motion, but I think the facts are that the state has the original, and Don Carlos has a copy.

Don Carlos motion requests a gag order (if the court were to grant Broden the evidence), but the motion hasn't been heard and decided, so no gag order presently exists over video from Don Carlos.

It appears to me that Don Carlos decided it was easier to comply with the subpoena than to fight it, and that compliance doesn't harm their civil claim against Twin Peaks.

4 posted on 07/11/2015 4:52:35 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson