To: stevie_d_64
So what’s the option?
Have a “debate” between 26 people? How’s that work?
To: Sherman Logan
Just do a show of hands. “Ok which of is in favor of building a wall on the southern border”? It would be very efficient.
11 posted on
07/11/2015 3:55:55 AM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Sherman Logan
Somehow trump will be excluded because he would embarrass them all
To: Sherman Logan
See my post #30. You might agree.
32 posted on
07/11/2015 4:45:13 AM PDT by
Lee'sGhost
("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
To: Sherman Logan
I'm for the 'Wheel of Fortune' method. Moderator asks the question FIRST then Meghan Kelly spins the wheel maybe 5 times per question.
74 posted on
07/11/2015 10:00:54 AM PDT by
houeto
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Sherman Logan
The whole problem with that scenario is that people would be evaluated based on their ability to give a two-minute speech rather than their ability to govern.
It might be controversial to say this but television has done a great disservice to the democratic process, in my opinion.
79 posted on
07/11/2015 11:26:53 AM PDT by
Lexinom
To: Sherman Logan
Have a “debate” between 26 people? How’s that work? I remember Ronald Reagan grabbing a Microphone saying, "I Paid for this Microphone." Seemed to work out for him.
84 posted on
07/11/2015 1:07:35 PM PDT by
itsahoot
(55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. RIH-GOP)
To: Sherman Logan
Multi-phase debate, random-selection participation, elimination rounds, and 5 finalists.
That oughta do it.
86 posted on
07/11/2015 3:40:50 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson