Posted on 07/09/2015 5:58:47 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
What does MSNBC's Alex Wagner have against stately Indian warriors? On today's Morning Joe, Wagner said it was "amazing" that anyone could look at the Washington Redskins logo and name and not find it controversial.
This NewsBuster can understand the debate over the "Redskins" name. But the logo? Has Alex actually had a look at the logo? Could Wagner be confusing it with the Cleveland Indians' Chief Yahoo? Seriously, what could be more stately, grave and dignified than the Redskin logo?
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
What does Alex Wagner have against stately Indian warriors? Ping to Today show list.
Well, if he’d pull his head out of his boyfriends butt and listen to actual humans instead of the pinkie out just so latte drinkers, he’d find that nobody really cares except the easily offended.
And the easily offended will simply find something else to be offended by after this..
James O’Keefe needs to start quizzing Democrat members of Congress and the Cabinet who are season ticket holders.
Bonus points for video of them wearing Redskins gear.
Alex is proof that those with a tiny IQ are easily amazed.....
Why is it that more non indians find this more offensive than indians do?
It amazes me that people put “Pro-Choice” bumper sticker on their vehicles.
Have a great idea. Replace the pic of the native with Teddy Kennedy and rename the team the Washington Criminals since the team represents the District of Criminals.
There is no honor for native American Indians among those who oppose the logo. The name resdkin was used first by red skins to distinguish themselves from white skins. Neither the name nor the logo are in any way derogatory. Ask a redeskin.
don’t go bringing logic, truth and history into this debate....liberals are immune to all of those....
I always thought that Indian tribal names were used because the team admired their toughness and wanted to be like them. I thought it was an honor not an insult. What did I know!
Redeskin sounds like a late night infomercial product to help hide blemishes and blackheads with a thin veneer of elastic skin-like adhesive.
> Why is it that more non indians find this more offensive than indians do?
You would think Indians would like that a football team is named after them. Why do the leftists get so offended by skin color? Answer: They’re mire racist than the “bigot” thet chastise.
> Why is it that more non indians find this more offensive than indians do?
You would think Indians would like that a football team is named after them. Why do the leftists get so offended by skin color? Answer: They’re more racist than the “bigot” thet chastise.
You joke, but after they get rid of “Redskins”, they will go after the “Washington” part, he owned slaves.
Uh, this Alex is a she.
Snyder should rename the team “Washington Foreskins”
That way he can make the gays happy and also at the same time give the home town a more accurate name...
*shrugs*
Still, removal of their head from orifices must be done.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.