And who decides what is considered "unbefitting" of a presidential candidate? The liberals and open borders crowd? I think, most of the phony claims and rhetoric coming out Obama's mouth for the last 6 years has been "unbefitting" of a president.
Trump may drop out, or he may not garner enough support to make it to the general or people may write him off as a buffoon or a clown, but he is entitled to be a candidate like anybody else and voice his opinions as he sees fit, unconventional or not. Personally, I am tired of the same old, same old coming out of the GOP in the last two elections. McCain might as well have been a democRAT. Romney tried to change the dialogue but he was too rich and too "unfeeling" towards the American people, according to some.
With 16 or 17 GOP candidates in the race now, whatever the latest number is, that should provide some fireworks as the candidates vie for a place in the first debate and try to pull away from the pack. If all of them were the same (and most of them are unfortunately--too many egos involved), how boring would that be and what would distinguish one from the other?
I say let Trump be Trump and let the chips fall where they may. All these companies and organizations pulling away from him because of his remarks, to me are the problem in this country, not Trump. They are too quick to cave-in and buckle under at the first whiff of the Left's cultural Marxist political correctness, that is designed to stifle rhetoric in the opposition. He must be right over the target with his Mexican comments considering all the flak he's been taking from both sides of the aisles.
BRAVO!