Yes. Given the “reasoning” of our idiot Supremes, there is no logical reason that “marriage” couldn’t be between absolutely anything at all.
- Two men and five women
- a man and his dog
- a lady and her parrot
- the Minnesota Vikings
- you and yourself
- you and the spirit of somebody who died a century ago
And on and on. This decision to destroy marriage was insane and the whole court should be impeached and expelled.
Great Idea. That means I can marry a rich dead woman and as the surviving spouse I get all the inheritance.
How can anybody take the supreme court of the United States of America seriously anymore.
If I marry myself am I taxed at the married rate for both my income and my spouses (me) income? Double taxation, anyone?
Not to mention a marriage between a person and an otherwise legal entity - Ross Perot could marry IBM with a board vote to approve. Think of the privileges: can’t be forced to testify against or disclose communications with a spouse; real estate sale tax exemptions for married couples. Corporations could marry each other- even multiple corporations or corporations and PACs could marry. Nonprofit corporate marriage could reduce your family income and property tax burdens by 50%-100%.