Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
For no more than he wanted with them, I doubt he should have had a problem. Perhaps he would have.

I think it was much more difficult for black guys to nail white women back then because the white women didn't want the stigma. They may have been happy to cozy up to him if it meant furthering their career goals, but actually doing the deed may have been a bridge too far. Pure speculation on my part, of course.

16 posted on 07/06/2015 3:10:52 PM PDT by KevinB (Barack Obama: Our first black, gay, Kenyan, Socialist, Muslim president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: KevinB

No, I think you have a pretty good handle on it. I wouldn’t disagree.


17 posted on 07/06/2015 3:12:14 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: KevinB
I think it was much more difficult for black guys to nail white women back then because the white women didn't want the stigma.

I don't know what it is like today, but in the late 1960s and the 1970s, white girls could not say no to blacks.

Our blacks friends had them coming or going, either they could attract them on their own merits and talents, or if that failed, then the line, "it's because I'm black", would take care of it.

23 posted on 07/06/2015 4:23:38 PM PDT by ansel12 (libertarians have always been for gay marriage and polygamy, gay Scout leaders, gay military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson