Like it or not there were many people wanting to arm the rebels. I didn’t like it but I don’t call it treason.
Seriously? We didn’t even know who the “rebels” were. Turns out some/most of them were bad guys.
You don’t call arming the ENEMY treason?
You don’t call sacrificing American lives to the ENEMY treason?
You don’t call freeing the ENEMY Taliban 5, Terror High Command, reason?
Get a new dictionary.
Any reasonable, sensible person can see a pattern. Treason at the highest levels, from both parties.
(Geez, with all the evidence, some clowns still make excuses. No wonder this has been allowed to go on for SO LONG!)
—were many people wanting to arm the rebels.
True. But in the old days we were trying to arm pro-American rebels. Now our leaders play with fire and end up arming anti-Christian and anti-life monsters.
An american who arms our enemies is a traitor.
The collective clouding of minds that led to the decision to arm the rebels arrayed against Bashar al-Assad, also prevented them from seeing the fallacy of the statement “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”. A three-sided confrontation on the battleground is rare, but it is happening. ISIS is fighting BOTH al-Assad and the other rebels arrayed against him. ISIS has even thrown down the gauntlet with Hamas, threatening to replace them in the Gaza strip, even though both have vowed to drive the Jews into the sea.
It may not have been treason, but it was definitely stupid, to lump ISIS together with other rebel forces. And yet, much of our war material and weaponry wound up in the hands of ISIS.
By accident or design, we have made ourselves allies of ISIS. Judging by the past actions of the Current Occupant now squatting in the Rainbow Hut, it was design.
I called it treason then, and I haven’t changed my mind. It was not a matter of mistaken interest, but a premeditated choice. Not all who voted knew, but those in power knew exactly what they were doing. It’s still ongoing...