This is ridiculous. Anyone who thinks the courts will be logically consistent (after the Supreme Court demonstrated that it can do the opposite of the plain meaning of words and legislate from the bench) is kidding themselves.
This could be an area where selective enforcement comes into play.
So, who is going to file the federal lawsuit against New York, New Jersey, etc?
No it is not. The Supreme Court's renouncement of reason places all inalienable rights at immediate risk. Obama or Clinton needs to replace just one justice to obtain a 5-4 vote to have the Second Amendment read “shall be infringed.”
Or they can flash a signal and turn one of the weak sisters currently on the court.
Already weighed in on this one but will again. No it won’t. no fundamental right found for “concealed carry”.
Pick one of the named justices above and send them a token of dignity befitting their decision - a butt plug (available from Amazon for under $5).
I sent a note with mine that “God doesn’t recognize your judicial immunity.”
hashtag ButtPlug4SCrOTUS
Tomorrow is the first day of Constitutional carry in Kansas. Everybody who is eligible to own a gun can conceal carry.
No no no American, the law works AGAINST you, that is the only way it works.
This is a good idea. Someone with the resources and time needs to open carry with publicity in New York City. He won’t get 15 feet before the police arrest him. Presto! Standing.
Article makes a good point, but the court has a history of taking its own decisions and then back away from them. For a branch of government that thinks it has the final edict, one would think they would live by those edicts.
This ruling killed for good the 10th Amendment. You may as well take it out of the document.