Only to a liberal like Juan, people cannot be trusted with weapons but the second they are employed by the government they somehow become responsible.
To liberals, police operate with backup which is why they need larger capacity pistol magazines than do “civilians”, who must face criminals alone and, therefore, need less ammunition.
To liberals, police officers, who qualify with their duty weapons once or twice a year, have some special Jedi-like mastery over handguns that private citizens can never hope to obtain.
Liberals believe anyone with a gun is a violent murderer waiting to happen, so I guess just because a liberal woman is equipped to be a prostitute means she is one.
Those demanding gun bans do so claiming there is so much violence warranting it somehow, yet, anyone wanting a gun to defend against such violence is just being “paranoid”.
To liberals, citizens don’t need to carry a gun for personal protection, but police chiefs, who are desk-bound administrators that work in a building filled with cops, need a gun.
To liberals, “assault weapons” have no purpose other than to kill large numbers of people, which is why the police need them to kill large numbers of people…for some reason.
To liberals, private citizens don’t need a gun for self-protection because the police are there to protect them even though the Supreme Court says the police are not responsible for their protection.
To liberals, trigger locks do not interfere with the ability to use a gun for defensive purposes, which is why you don’t see police officers with one on their duty weapon.
Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, and Chicago cops need guns and those cities have the highest murder and violence rates. Again, We the People are only being paranoid if we want a gun to defend ourselves from that violence.
To a liberal, the more helpless you are the safer you are from criminals.
Washington DC’s low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis’ high murder rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control. Wait, huh?
To a liberal, a woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.
To a liberal, ordinary people in the presence of a gun turn into slaughtering butchers but revert to normal when the weapon is removed, so we should ban guns.
To a liberal, guns cause violence, which is why there are so many mass killings at gun shows and police stations.
To a liberal, a majority of the population supports gun control so we should do it, just like a majority of the population once supported owning slaves.
To a liberal, most people can’t be trusted with a gun so we should have laws banning guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.
To a liberal, the 2nd Amendment was written during a time when muskets were the norm, but they do not agree that the 1st amendment should only pertain to yelling in the town square and printing using quill pens and manual printing presses.
To a liberal, we should ban “Saturday Night Specials” and other inexpensive guns because it’s not fair that poor people have access to guns too.
To a liberal, having a gun in case if violence is stupid and paranoid, yet, a person is more likely to encounter violence against them than a fire but fire extinguishers are everywhere.
Makes me wonder how much concern they have about car accidents, which I can say are probably vastly understated as a threat.