Posted on 06/26/2015 7:43:21 AM PDT by MN_Mike
The march to radical change is one step at a time. While this seems to be the final step on this journey, NEVER underestimate the radical left’s push for the next step and step after that. There is no low for them where they will not try to go even lower and its only a matter of time on this.
Yep. Just more fuel for trial lawyers and additional court interpretations and decisions. Essentially, the decision will stop States from enforcing laws against same sex marriage, but it doesn’t force party’s to perform them. That is where the future court cases will go. This thing is like Roe Vs. Wade and there will be court cases testing it for decades. The trial Lawyers love these kind of decisions.
All of the things we are seeing now are just a small part of the plan. The end goal is to destroy religion as we know it. That is the true goal of the left. Without religion we will live in an ‘anything goes’ society. If you hold your nose and read any of the liberal blogs and forums you will see and feel the hatred for religion and anything else that is good, decent and moral.
I’m sorry. Where did it say in the ruling that the Church must enforce same sex marriage?
Yes, this is a loss. But not a great one. This entire farce, just like yesterday’s ruling on Obamacare is based on nothing more than a word. Yesterday it was “States.” Today it is “Marriage.”
The problem with Conservatives is that we know how to fight back but we don’t. Look what we did at ChikFilA. Look what we did with Hobby Lobby. Our values. as long as “WE” don’t let them be compromised will never wane.
Want to fight this? Change one word and resubmit to the Congress. Change “Marriage” to say, “Holy Matrimony.” It becomes game, set and match. And it serves as a separation between Church and State. But more importantly, it forces Democrats and RINO’s to go on record.
Remember, you don’t have Holy Matrimony in city hall. It is under God which was the purpose of this fight to begin with. Take the semantics out of it, call it what it really is and let’s win the fight.
Where others would just give up in the face of SCOTUS decision Cruz/Lee keep fighting and further Cruz calls the SCOTUS lawless and rogue.
Boldly battling the enemies within and without... CRUZ 2016!
Cruz is a Lawyer and his wife is a Wall Street Broker/Analyst. When he decides to go after the Supreme Court, I would hope he would do the same with the Trial Lawyers and Wall Street Bankers AND refuse their money...FAT CHANCE!
Now that they have tripped this wire-sodomite “marriage”-IMO, all the doors are down
That applies to Churches and other religious institutions. But not, I think, to small businesses/individuals of conscience who seek to live their lives according to their personal beliefs.
This is precisely what Congress can do; precisely what Congress should do. By the way, as I have been pointing out for over forty years, it is the way Congress could have handled the abortion, affirmative action, school prayer & Legislative reapportionment abuses; all also rationalized on the basis of 14th Amendment arguments. (For more, see the last Chapter of The Conservative Debate Handbook.)
According to the Framers of America's Constitution to structure and limit government power, no branch of government, including the Legislative, was delegated a power to interfere in religious freedom or its free exercise.
North Carolina's James Iredell, appointed by President Washington as a Justice on the first Supreme Court declared:
Had Congress undertaken to guarantee religious freedom, or any particular species of it, they would then have had a pretense to interfere in a subject they have nothing to do with. Each state, so far as the clause in question does not interfere, must be left to the operation of its own principles. - James Iredell - Debates on the Constitution, NC, 1788 (Appointed by Geo. Washington to First Supreme Court of the U. S.)Your comments?
The First Amendment was never intended to limit the ability of any State or community's ability to hold religious observances. It is a guarantee against Congress--the Federal Legislature's--having any role with respect to same. It did not interfere with any religious community than extant; and it is only by specious rationalizations that the ACLU has twisted our Constitutional Law away from the clear intent, into a battering ram against people of Faith in contemporary America.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.